The General Longshore Transport (GLT) model (Tomasicchio et al., 2013) and the Van Rijn (2014) expression represent the only two available general formulae in literature for the estimation of longshore transport (LT) at sand, gravel and shingle beaches. The GLT model is based on an energy flux approach combined with an empirical relationship between the wave induced forcing and the number of moving elements. An independent ver-ification of the GLT model is performed for the estimation of the total (bulk) LT at shingle beaches. Without any further calibration, the suitability of the GLT model, even for the shingles beach case, is assessed by means of the comparison between the LT predictions and the observations from two field data sets (Chadwick, 1989; Nicholls and Wright, 1991). In most cases the GLT predicts LT rates within a factor of 2 of the observed values. The predictive capability of the GLT model is tested with reference to two different formulae recently proposed in literature (Mil-Homens et al., 2013; Van Rijn, 2014). It is shown that the GLT model gives a better agreement with the observations (Chadwick, 1989; Nicholls and Wright, 1991; Van Hijum and Pilarczyk, 1982) with respect to the other considered formulae. Moreover, long term (annual) field data (Van Wellen et al., 2000) have been used for a further verification. In addition, the GLT model confirms to have a better agreement even for the LT at dynamically stable berm reshaping breakwaters (Lamberti and Tomasicchio, 1997; Van der Meer and Veldman, 1992).

Longshore transport at shingle beaches: an independent verification of the general model / G. Tomasicchio, F. D'Alessandro, G. Barbaro, E. Musci, T.M. De Giosa. - In: COASTAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 0378-3839. - 104(2015), pp. 69-75.

Longshore transport at shingle beaches: an independent verification of the general model

F. D'Alessandro;
2015

Abstract

The General Longshore Transport (GLT) model (Tomasicchio et al., 2013) and the Van Rijn (2014) expression represent the only two available general formulae in literature for the estimation of longshore transport (LT) at sand, gravel and shingle beaches. The GLT model is based on an energy flux approach combined with an empirical relationship between the wave induced forcing and the number of moving elements. An independent ver-ification of the GLT model is performed for the estimation of the total (bulk) LT at shingle beaches. Without any further calibration, the suitability of the GLT model, even for the shingles beach case, is assessed by means of the comparison between the LT predictions and the observations from two field data sets (Chadwick, 1989; Nicholls and Wright, 1991). In most cases the GLT predicts LT rates within a factor of 2 of the observed values. The predictive capability of the GLT model is tested with reference to two different formulae recently proposed in literature (Mil-Homens et al., 2013; Van Rijn, 2014). It is shown that the GLT model gives a better agreement with the observations (Chadwick, 1989; Nicholls and Wright, 1991; Van Hijum and Pilarczyk, 1982) with respect to the other considered formulae. Moreover, long term (annual) field data (Van Wellen et al., 2000) have been used for a further verification. In addition, the GLT model confirms to have a better agreement even for the LT at dynamically stable berm reshaping breakwaters (Lamberti and Tomasicchio, 1997; Van der Meer and Veldman, 1992).
Longshore transport; Energy flux; General model; Shingle beaches; Field and laboratory data
Settore ICAR/02 - Costruzioni Idrauliche e Marittime e Idrologia
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
J.12_CENG_104_2015.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 656.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
656.75 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/666305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact