Background The 'biologically effective dose markers': DNA and protein adducts, are a direct index of carcinogen induced cell damage and an indirect one of genetic susceptibility. This study aimed to examine the dose-response relationship for 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in oral cells of smokers and non smokers. Materials and Methods. An immunoperoxidase method with the monoclonal 3C8 antibody, which recognizes 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA, has been wed for detecting DNA damage in oral cells of 12 smokers and 12 non smokers. Results. Higher staining for 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA was detected in the cells of smokers (187 ± 42) vs. non smokers (135 ± 35) (p = 0.004), with a twofold range in relative staining for both groups, suggesting individual differences relevance in metabolizing carcinogens and/or repairing DNA damage. Conclusions. This non invasive method requiring small cell amounts is a tool for monitoring large groups of subjects at risk in primary prevention programs.
Immunohistochemical analysis of 4-aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in oral mucosal cells of smokers and nonsmokers / G. Romano, R. Mancini, P. Fedele, G. Curigliano, G. Flamini, M. Giovagnoli, N. Malara, A. Boninsegna, A. Vecchione, R. Santella, A. Cittadini. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - 17:4 A(1997), pp. 2827-2830.
Immunohistochemical analysis of 4-aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in oral mucosal cells of smokers and nonsmokers
G. Curigliano
;
1997
Abstract
Background The 'biologically effective dose markers': DNA and protein adducts, are a direct index of carcinogen induced cell damage and an indirect one of genetic susceptibility. This study aimed to examine the dose-response relationship for 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in oral cells of smokers and non smokers. Materials and Methods. An immunoperoxidase method with the monoclonal 3C8 antibody, which recognizes 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA, has been wed for detecting DNA damage in oral cells of 12 smokers and 12 non smokers. Results. Higher staining for 4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA was detected in the cells of smokers (187 ± 42) vs. non smokers (135 ± 35) (p = 0.004), with a twofold range in relative staining for both groups, suggesting individual differences relevance in metabolizing carcinogens and/or repairing DNA damage. Conclusions. This non invasive method requiring small cell amounts is a tool for monitoring large groups of subjects at risk in primary prevention programs.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
228-1997.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
628.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
628.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.