Interdisciplinary research (IDR) has raised increasing expectations among scholars and policymakers about its potential to produce ground-breaking scientific contributions and satisfy societal demands. While existing research highlights that novel connections across fields is beneficial for scientific contributions with high academic impact, comparatively less is known about whether IDR is positively associated to scientists' engagement with non-academic actors. To investigate this, we examine whether there is a systematic relationship between scientists' IDR-orientation and their interactions with industry. We conceptually distinguish four stylized modes of interaction (firm creation, technology transfer, co-production and response modes) and employ three distinct indicators of IDR. We use data on 1,170 scientists affiliated to public research organizations in Spain, bibliometric dataset of scientists' publications, and details of scientists' past involvement in interactions with industry. Our results show that IDR has a transversal influence on all four modes. However, IDR-oriented scientists are more strongly associated to transactional (market-mediated) compared to relational (personal-based) interaction mechanisms; while we find no evidence of a significant difference between IDR-oriented scientists and their propensity to engage in different modes of U-I interaction according to the degree of goal specificity.

The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction / P. D’Este, O. Llopis, F. Rentocchini, A. Yegros. - In: RESEARCH POLICY. - ISSN 0048-7333. - 48:9(2019 Nov). [10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.008]

The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction

F. Rentocchini
Penultimo
;
2019

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research (IDR) has raised increasing expectations among scholars and policymakers about its potential to produce ground-breaking scientific contributions and satisfy societal demands. While existing research highlights that novel connections across fields is beneficial for scientific contributions with high academic impact, comparatively less is known about whether IDR is positively associated to scientists' engagement with non-academic actors. To investigate this, we examine whether there is a systematic relationship between scientists' IDR-orientation and their interactions with industry. We conceptually distinguish four stylized modes of interaction (firm creation, technology transfer, co-production and response modes) and employ three distinct indicators of IDR. We use data on 1,170 scientists affiliated to public research organizations in Spain, bibliometric dataset of scientists' publications, and details of scientists' past involvement in interactions with industry. Our results show that IDR has a transversal influence on all four modes. However, IDR-oriented scientists are more strongly associated to transactional (market-mediated) compared to relational (personal-based) interaction mechanisms; while we find no evidence of a significant difference between IDR-oriented scientists and their propensity to engage in different modes of U-I interaction according to the degree of goal specificity.
interdisciplinarity; university-industry interaction; academic entrepreneurship; technology transfer; co-production; response mode
Settore SECS-P/08 - Economia e Gestione delle Imprese
Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia Applicata
nov-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RP_post-print.pdf

Open Access dal 02/11/2020

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 606.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
606.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S0048733319301192-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.44 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/658305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact