In 2015, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of formic acid, ammonium formate and sodium formate as feed hygiene agents for all animal species. In this opinion, two forms of the additive sodium formate, a solid form (specified to contain ≥ 98% sodium formate (w/w)) and a liquid form (specified to contain a minimum of 15% sodium formate, a maximum of 75% free formic acid and a maximum of 25% water), were assessed. Sodium formate was considered safe for all animal species at a maximum concentration of 10,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed (with the exception of pigs, for which a maximum concentration of 12,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed was considered safe). Sodium formate was also considered safe for the consumer and the environment. The Panel also concluded that sodium formate is corrosive. The Panel also concluded that ‘for sodium formate, limited data are available to demonstrate their effects in feed’. In the current opinion, additional data to demonstrate the efficacy of sodium formate liquid as a hygiene condition enhancer in feed for all animal species were assessed. The Panel concluded that sodium formate liquid has the potential to be efficacious as hygiene condition enhancer in feedingstuffs for all animal species at the proposed use level.

Efficacy of sodium formate as a technological feed additive (hygiene condition enhancer) for all animal species / V. Bampidis, G. Azimonti, M.D.L. Bastos, H. Christensen, B. Dusemund, M. Kouba, M. Kos Durjava, M. Lopez-Alonso, S. Lopez Puente, F. Marcon, B. Mayo, A. Pechova, M. Petkova, F. Ramos, Y. Sanz, R.E. Villa, R. Woutersen, R. Brozzi, J. Galobart, G. Lopez-Galvez, L. Gregoretti, M.V. Vettori, M.L. Innocenti. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 17:3(2019 Mar). [10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5645]

Efficacy of sodium formate as a technological feed additive (hygiene condition enhancer) for all animal species

R.E. Villa;
2019

Abstract

In 2015, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of formic acid, ammonium formate and sodium formate as feed hygiene agents for all animal species. In this opinion, two forms of the additive sodium formate, a solid form (specified to contain ≥ 98% sodium formate (w/w)) and a liquid form (specified to contain a minimum of 15% sodium formate, a maximum of 75% free formic acid and a maximum of 25% water), were assessed. Sodium formate was considered safe for all animal species at a maximum concentration of 10,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed (with the exception of pigs, for which a maximum concentration of 12,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed was considered safe). Sodium formate was also considered safe for the consumer and the environment. The Panel also concluded that sodium formate is corrosive. The Panel also concluded that ‘for sodium formate, limited data are available to demonstrate their effects in feed’. In the current opinion, additional data to demonstrate the efficacy of sodium formate liquid as a hygiene condition enhancer in feed for all animal species were assessed. The Panel concluded that sodium formate liquid has the potential to be efficacious as hygiene condition enhancer in feedingstuffs for all animal species at the proposed use level.
technological additive, hygiene condition enhancer, sodium formate, efficacy
Settore VET/07 - Farmacologia e Tossicologia Veterinaria
mar-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
(FEEDAP)_et_al-2019-EFSA_Journal (7).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 907.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
907.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/654905
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact