It is natural to describe many pictures as of movement. We might for example say that a painting is of a horse rearing up, or a dog scurry along the pavement. The topic of this paper is how this "of" should be understood. Can a static picture depict movement, or is movement merely represented by, or suggested by, pictures, in some non-pictorial way? We argue that movement can be depicted and not merely represented. We examine three different views put forward by Le Poidevin, and use his third as a basis for our own view of movement depiction, which is a version of Hopkins's experienced resemblance theory of depiction.
Can movement be depicted? / C. Calabi, N.I. Young. - In: PHENOMENOLOGY AND MIND. - ISSN 2280-7853. - 14(2018), pp. 170-179.
|Titolo:||Can movement be depicted?|
CALABI, CLOTILDE (Secondo) (Corresponding)
YOUNG, NICHOLAS IAN (Primo) (Corresponding)
|Parole Chiave:||Depiction; movement perception; representational theories of depiction; temporal experience; specious present; outline shape|
|Settore Scientifico Disciplinare:||Settore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia e Teoria dei Linguaggi|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2018|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-23667|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01 - Articolo su periodico|