ObjectiveRathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is a common sellar lesion which may cause visual impairment, hypopituitarism and headaches from mass effect. The natural history of these lesions is currently unclear. We investigated the natural history of RCCs and compared surgically treated patients with those treated conservatively. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with a RCC between 1996 and 2016 at Stanford University and Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano. ResultsPatients were divided into 2 cohorts: Group A, 72 subjects who underwent surgical resection of a symptomatic RCC, and Group B, 62 subjects managed conservatively. Compared to Group B, Group A subjects had larger RCCs (79% vs 22% had a largest diameter >10mm, P<.001) and were more likely (41.5% vs 16%, P<.001) to present with hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus (DI) (18% vs 1.6%, P=.002). In Group A, after a mean follow-up of 53.7months, 12.5% of patients had recurrence and a second surgery. After surgery, 35% of patients recovered pituitary function. Hyperprolactinemia (26.6%) and hypogonadism (66.6%) resolved more commonly that did DI (20.1%). New pituitary deficits appeared in 16.6% of patients after surgery. In Group B, with a mean follow-up of 41months, only 6.4% had cyst enlargement, none underwent surgery, and none developed a pituitary deficit. ConclusionOur data offer guidance in decision-making regarding the management of RCC patients and confirm the safety of conservative treatment in asymptomatic patients.

Natural history of Rathke's cleft cysts: A retrospective analysis of a two centres experience / E. Sala, J.M. Moore, A. Amorin, G. Carosi, H. Jr Martinez, G.R. Harsh, M. Arosio, G. Mantovani, L. Katznelson. - In: CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 0300-0664. - 89:2(2018 Aug), pp. 178-186. [10.1111/cen.13744]

Natural history of Rathke's cleft cysts: A retrospective analysis of a two centres experience

G. Carosi;M. Arosio;G. Mantovani;
2018

Abstract

ObjectiveRathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is a common sellar lesion which may cause visual impairment, hypopituitarism and headaches from mass effect. The natural history of these lesions is currently unclear. We investigated the natural history of RCCs and compared surgically treated patients with those treated conservatively. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with a RCC between 1996 and 2016 at Stanford University and Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano. ResultsPatients were divided into 2 cohorts: Group A, 72 subjects who underwent surgical resection of a symptomatic RCC, and Group B, 62 subjects managed conservatively. Compared to Group B, Group A subjects had larger RCCs (79% vs 22% had a largest diameter >10mm, P<.001) and were more likely (41.5% vs 16%, P<.001) to present with hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus (DI) (18% vs 1.6%, P=.002). In Group A, after a mean follow-up of 53.7months, 12.5% of patients had recurrence and a second surgery. After surgery, 35% of patients recovered pituitary function. Hyperprolactinemia (26.6%) and hypogonadism (66.6%) resolved more commonly that did DI (20.1%). New pituitary deficits appeared in 16.6% of patients after surgery. In Group B, with a mean follow-up of 41months, only 6.4% had cyst enlargement, none underwent surgery, and none developed a pituitary deficit. ConclusionOur data offer guidance in decision-making regarding the management of RCC patients and confirm the safety of conservative treatment in asymptomatic patients.
diabetes insipidus; hypopituitarism; neuroendocrinology; pituitary; pituitary tumour; Rathke's cleft cyst; transsphenoidal surgery
Settore MED/13 - Endocrinologia
ago-2018
15-mag-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sala_et_al-2018-Clinical_Endocrinology.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 505.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
505.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/621206
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact