The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation science that replaces the previous 5-year cyclic batch-and-queue approach process. This is the first of an annual series of International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations summary articles that will include the cardiopulmonary resuscitation science reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation in the previous year. The review this year includes 5 basic life support and 1 pediatric Consensuses on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Each of these includes a summary of the science and its quality based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force members are provided in Values and Preferences sections. Finally, the task force members have prioritized and listed the top 3 knowledge gaps for each population, intervention, comparator, and outcome question.

2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary / T. Olasveengen, A. de Caen, M. Mancini, I. Maconochie, R. Aickin, D. Atkins, R. Berg, R. Bingham, S. Brooks, M. Castrén, S. Chung, J. Considine, T. Couto, R. Escalante, R. Gazmuri, A. Guerguerian, T. Hatanaka, R. Koster, P. Kudenchuk, E. Lang, S. Lim, B. Løfgren, P. Meaney, W. Montgomery, P. Morley, L. Morrison, K. Nation, K. Ng, V. Nadkarni, C. Nishiyama, G. Nuthall, G. Ong, G. Perkins, A. Reis, G. Ristagno, T. Sakamoto, M. Sayre, S. Schexnayder, A. Sierra, E. Singletary, N. Shimizu, M. Smyth, D. Stanton, J. Tijssen, A. Travers, C. Vaillancourt, P. Van de Voorde, M. Hazinski, J. Nolan. - In: CIRCULATION. - ISSN 0009-7322. - 136:23(2017 Dec), pp. e424-e440.

2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary

G. Ristagno;
2017

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation science that replaces the previous 5-year cyclic batch-and-queue approach process. This is the first of an annual series of International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations summary articles that will include the cardiopulmonary resuscitation science reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation in the previous year. The review this year includes 5 basic life support and 1 pediatric Consensuses on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Each of these includes a summary of the science and its quality based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force members are provided in Values and Preferences sections. Finally, the task force members have prioritized and listed the top 3 knowledge gaps for each population, intervention, comparator, and outcome question.
AHA Scientific Statements; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; heart massage
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
dic-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Circualtion2017 ilcor.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 214.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
214.09 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
CIR.0000000000000541.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 125.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.28 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/620395
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 70
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 87
social impact