This literature review was built upon recently published articles on Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of agricultural biogas plants, to: enhance understanding of the relevant literature in the field and the related question by readers worldwide. It was designed to highlight methodological issues and impact indicators, which best represent this research field; consequently, they should be considered in performing environmental assessments of agro-biogas derived energy systems. The literature review highlighted the wide variability of environmental results due to the ways the feedstock mixtures were produced, managed, and supplied; and due to the regions in which the anaerobic digesters were located and operated. Differences were found to be related to the aim and function of the study and to the methodological approach used, especially for the development of the environmental impact assessments. Other differences resulted from the ways the energy produced was utilised, whether it was used as an input to the natural gas national grid, and/or if it was used within the production system. The authors of this review concluded that, although much progress has been made, many unsolved challenges and methodological choices must be addressed to further improve the robustness of LCA in relation to AD and to related approaches.

Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems : a comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments / C. Ingrao, J. Bacenetti, J. Adamczyk, V. Ferrante, A. Messineo, D. Huisingh. - In: RENEWABLE ENERGY. - ISSN 0960-1481. - 136(2019 Jun), pp. 296-307.

Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems : a comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments

J. Bacenetti
Secondo
;
V. Ferrante;
2019

Abstract

This literature review was built upon recently published articles on Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of agricultural biogas plants, to: enhance understanding of the relevant literature in the field and the related question by readers worldwide. It was designed to highlight methodological issues and impact indicators, which best represent this research field; consequently, they should be considered in performing environmental assessments of agro-biogas derived energy systems. The literature review highlighted the wide variability of environmental results due to the ways the feedstock mixtures were produced, managed, and supplied; and due to the regions in which the anaerobic digesters were located and operated. Differences were found to be related to the aim and function of the study and to the methodological approach used, especially for the development of the environmental impact assessments. Other differences resulted from the ways the energy produced was utilised, whether it was used as an input to the natural gas national grid, and/or if it was used within the production system. The authors of this review concluded that, although much progress has been made, many unsolved challenges and methodological choices must be addressed to further improve the robustness of LCA in relation to AD and to related approaches.
biomass-based energy; anaerobic digestion; life cycle assessment; energy performance; environmental sustainability; comprehensive literature review
Settore AGR/09 - Meccanica Agraria
giu-2019
gen-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ingrao et al 2019.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 445.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
445.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
INGRAO~2.PDF

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 523.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
523.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/610859
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 69
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact