In the aftermath of the defeat suffered at the Lake Trasimene, the Romans elected Q. Fabius Maximus dictator and M. Minucius Rufus magister equitum. Livy records that both men were directly created by the comitia, a very exceptional circumstance. For a long time, scholars have accepted this solution, but in the last years a good number of historians have forwarded new hypothesis, suggesting that the nominees of Fabius and Minucius were made by an interrex (as Sulla in 82 B.C.) or a praetor (as Caesar in 44 B.C.). This paper considers and analyses these new theories, but finally argues that the old solution of a popular creano is still the one that must be preferred.

La (pro)dittatura di Q. Fabio Massimo (217 a.C.) : a proposito di alcune ipotesi recenti / M. Bellomo. - In: REVUE DES ETUDES ANCIENNES. - ISSN 0035-2004. - 120:1(2018 Jul), pp. 37-56.

La (pro)dittatura di Q. Fabio Massimo (217 a.C.) : a proposito di alcune ipotesi recenti

M. Bellomo
2018

Abstract

In the aftermath of the defeat suffered at the Lake Trasimene, the Romans elected Q. Fabius Maximus dictator and M. Minucius Rufus magister equitum. Livy records that both men were directly created by the comitia, a very exceptional circumstance. For a long time, scholars have accepted this solution, but in the last years a good number of historians have forwarded new hypothesis, suggesting that the nominees of Fabius and Minucius were made by an interrex (as Sulla in 82 B.C.) or a praetor (as Caesar in 44 B.C.). This paper considers and analyses these new theories, but finally argues that the old solution of a popular creano is still the one that must be preferred.
Au lendemain de la défaite subie au lac Trasimène (juin 217 av. J.-C.), les Romains nommaient le dictateur Q. Fabius Maximus et M. Minucius Rufus magister equitum. Tite Live note que les deux hommes ont été élus directement par les comitia, ce qui est une circonstance très exceptionnelle. Depuis longtemps, les chercheurs ont accepté cette solution, mais ces dernières années un bon nombre d’historiens ont avancé de nouvelles hypothèses, suggérant que les désignations de Fabius et Minucius ont été faites par un interrex (comme Sylla en 82 av. J.-C.) ou un préteur (comme César en 44 av. J.-C.). Cet article prend en compte et examine ces nouvelles théories, mais pour finir, soutient que la vieille solution d’une creatio populaire est encore celle qui doit être préférée.
Q. Fabius Maximus (diet. 217, cos. 233, 228, 215, 214, 209 a. C) interregnum; Roman dictatorship ;The second Punic war
Settore L-ANT/03 - Storia Romana
lug-2018
http://www.revue-etudes-anciennes.fr/michele-bellomo-la-prodittatura-di-quinto-fabio-massimo-217-a-c-a-proposito-di-alcune-ipotesi-recenti/
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bellomo, Quinto Fabio Massimo.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/603761
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact