Objectives: To characterize adverse reactions associated with medication errors (ME) reported in US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (US-FAERS), and to identify the potential signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) for different drugs. Methods: ME associated Individual Case Study Report (ICSRs) were identified. ICSRs were categorized by patient age groups, affected stages of medication process and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Disproportionality analyses were performed for different age groups. Results: 46,8677 ICSRs were retrieved. An increasing trend in reporting of cases of ME was observed during the studied period. Immunosuppressants and psycholeptic drugs were most frequently involved. Administration errors were reported most frequently, followed by prescribing and dispensing errors. In neonates, SDR following wrong drug administration, wrong dose, and accidental overdose were associated with methylergonovine, zidovudine, and acetaminophen. In elderlies, SDR were found for dose omission and underdose error associated with etanercept and evolocumab. Conclusion: While a detailed root-cause analysis for ME characteristic can rarely be performed on such a dataset, data mining for signals in spontaneous reporting database may assist in identifying potential ME in a more standardized and objective manner. Continued use of spontaneous reporting system for identifying MEs is encouraged to prevent unnecessary patient harm.

A characterisation and disproportionality analysis of medication error related adverse events reported to the FAERS database / C. Carnovale, F. Mazhar, M. Pozzi, M. Gentili, E. Clementi, S. Radice. - In: EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY. - ISSN 1474-0338. - 17:12(2018 Dec), pp. 1161-1169.

A characterisation and disproportionality analysis of medication error related adverse events reported to the FAERS database

C. Carnovale;F. Mazhar;M. Gentili;E. Clementi
;
S. Radice
2018

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize adverse reactions associated with medication errors (ME) reported in US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (US-FAERS), and to identify the potential signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) for different drugs. Methods: ME associated Individual Case Study Report (ICSRs) were identified. ICSRs were categorized by patient age groups, affected stages of medication process and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Disproportionality analyses were performed for different age groups. Results: 46,8677 ICSRs were retrieved. An increasing trend in reporting of cases of ME was observed during the studied period. Immunosuppressants and psycholeptic drugs were most frequently involved. Administration errors were reported most frequently, followed by prescribing and dispensing errors. In neonates, SDR following wrong drug administration, wrong dose, and accidental overdose were associated with methylergonovine, zidovudine, and acetaminophen. In elderlies, SDR were found for dose omission and underdose error associated with etanercept and evolocumab. Conclusion: While a detailed root-cause analysis for ME characteristic can rarely be performed on such a dataset, data mining for signals in spontaneous reporting database may assist in identifying potential ME in a more standardized and objective manner. Continued use of spontaneous reporting system for identifying MEs is encouraged to prevent unnecessary patient harm.
medication error; adverse events; patient safety; signal detection
Settore BIO/14 - Farmacologia
dic-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A characterisation and disproportionality analysis.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 2.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.08 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/602935
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact