Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing a joint methodology for estimating the national and global work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO joint methodology), with contributions from a large network of experts. In this paper, we present the protocol for two systematic reviews of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years attributable to pneumoconiosis from occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres, to inform the development of the WHO/ILO joint methodology. Objectives: We aim to systematically review studies on occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres (Systematic Review 1) and systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis (Systematic Review 2), applying the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology as an organizing framework. Data sources: Separately for Systematic Reviews 1 and 2, we will search electronic academic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and CISDOC. We will also search electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational

WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury : Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis / D. Mandrioli, V. Schlünssen, B. Ádám, R.A. Cohen, C. Colosio, W. Chen, A. Fischer, L. Godderis, T. Göen, I.D. Ivanov, N. Leppink, S. Mandic-Rajcevic, F. Masci, B. Nemery, F. Pega, A. Prüss-Üstün, D. Sgargi, Y. Ujita, S. van der Mierden, M. Zungu, P.T.J. Scheepers. - In: ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0160-4120. - 119(2018 Jun 06), pp. 174-185. [10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.005]

WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury : Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis

C. Colosio;S. Mandic-Rajcevic;F. Masci;
2018

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing a joint methodology for estimating the national and global work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO joint methodology), with contributions from a large network of experts. In this paper, we present the protocol for two systematic reviews of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years attributable to pneumoconiosis from occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres, to inform the development of the WHO/ILO joint methodology. Objectives: We aim to systematically review studies on occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres (Systematic Review 1) and systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis (Systematic Review 2), applying the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology as an organizing framework. Data sources: Separately for Systematic Reviews 1 and 2, we will search electronic academic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and CISDOC. We will also search electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational
Asbestos; Asbestosis; Coal dust; Occupational health; Silica; Silicosis
Settore MED/44 - Medicina del Lavoro
6-giu-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
WHO_ILO.Respiratory .2018.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 423.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
423.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/602137
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact