Background: Although the creation of a stoma reduces the risk of septic pouch complications following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the stoma itself and its reversal can give rise to substantial morbidity during the two- or three-stage concept. Aim of study is to compare stoma-related complications in Ulcerative Colitis patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open IPAA. Methods: We collected data on 250 IPAA patients from two Italian Centres between 2005 and 2015. We compared perioperative and postoperative events in 150 open vs 100 laparoscopic IPAA. We performed a case-matched analysis based on baseline differences among groups to compare the rate of mechanical complications. Results: There were no significant differences between open and laparoscopic IPAA in overall stoma complications (complications during ileostomy: 11.3% vs 12%,p = 0.8; early complications: 10% vs 8%,p = 0.5; late complications: 12.6% vs 6%,p = 0.08). The case-matched analysis found a slightly reduced incidence of obstructive complications at any stage with laparoscopy. Conclusions: Overall stoma related complications do not seem to be reduced by minimally-invasive approach itself, but patients might experience less mechanical problems with laparoscopy without conversion.

Minimally invasive surgery and stoma-related complications after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. A two-centre comparison with open approach / F. Colombo, G. Pellino, F. Selvaggi, F. Corsi, G. Sciaudone, G.M. Sampietro, D. Foschi. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0002-9610. - (2018 Jul 24). [Epub ahead of print]

Minimally invasive surgery and stoma-related complications after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. A two-centre comparison with open approach

F. Colombo
Primo
;
F. Corsi;D. Foschi
2018

Abstract

Background: Although the creation of a stoma reduces the risk of septic pouch complications following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the stoma itself and its reversal can give rise to substantial morbidity during the two- or three-stage concept. Aim of study is to compare stoma-related complications in Ulcerative Colitis patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open IPAA. Methods: We collected data on 250 IPAA patients from two Italian Centres between 2005 and 2015. We compared perioperative and postoperative events in 150 open vs 100 laparoscopic IPAA. We performed a case-matched analysis based on baseline differences among groups to compare the rate of mechanical complications. Results: There were no significant differences between open and laparoscopic IPAA in overall stoma complications (complications during ileostomy: 11.3% vs 12%,p = 0.8; early complications: 10% vs 8%,p = 0.5; late complications: 12.6% vs 6%,p = 0.08). The case-matched analysis found a slightly reduced incidence of obstructive complications at any stage with laparoscopy. Conclusions: Overall stoma related complications do not seem to be reduced by minimally-invasive approach itself, but patients might experience less mechanical problems with laparoscopy without conversion.
Pouch; Stoma; Surgery; Ulcerative colitis; Surgery
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
24-lug-2018
24-lug-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AMJS Proof.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 791.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
791.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S0002961018304392-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 213.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/599317
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact