The clinical use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasing, especially for applications requiring paramagnetic contrast-agent injection. This document presents a synthetic list of acceptable indications with potential advantages for women according to evidence from the literature and the expert opinion of the panel that developed this statement. We generally recommend that breast MR imaging be performed in centres with experience in conventional breast imaging [mammography and ultrasonography (US)] and needle-biopsy procedures (under stereotactic or US guidance) as well as in breast MR imaging and second-look US for findings not revealed by conventional imaging performed before MR imaging. In our opinion, there is no evidence in favour of breast MR imaging as a diagnostic tool to characterise equivocal findings at conventional imaging when needle-biopsy procedures can be performed, nor for the study of asymptomatic, non-high-risk women with negative conventional imaging. After a description of technical and methodological requirements, we define the indications and limitations of breast MR imaging for surveillance of high-risk women, local staging before surgery, evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast previously treated for carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome, nipple discharge and breast implants.

Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document “Attualità in Senologia”, Florence 2007 / F. Sardanelli, G.M. Giuseppetti, G. Canavese, L. Cataliotti, S. Corcione, E. Cossu, M. Federico, L. Marotti, L. Martincich, P. Panizza, F. Podo, M. Rosselli Del Turco, C. Zuiani, C. Alfano, M. Bazzocchi, P. Belli, S. Bianchi, A. Cilotti, M. Calabrese, L. Carbonaro, L. Cortesi, C. Di Maggio, A. Del Maschio, A. Esseridou, A. Fausto, M. Gennaro, R. Girometti, R. Ienzi, A. Luini, S. Manoukian, S. Morassutt, D. Morrone, J. Nori, A. Orlacchio, F. Pane, P. Panzarola, R. Ponzone, G. Simonetti, P. Torricelli, G. Valeri. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 0033-8362. - 113:8(2008 Dec), pp. 1085-1095.

Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document “Attualità in Senologia”, Florence 2007

F. Sardanelli
Primo
;
L. Carbonaro;
2008

Abstract

The clinical use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasing, especially for applications requiring paramagnetic contrast-agent injection. This document presents a synthetic list of acceptable indications with potential advantages for women according to evidence from the literature and the expert opinion of the panel that developed this statement. We generally recommend that breast MR imaging be performed in centres with experience in conventional breast imaging [mammography and ultrasonography (US)] and needle-biopsy procedures (under stereotactic or US guidance) as well as in breast MR imaging and second-look US for findings not revealed by conventional imaging performed before MR imaging. In our opinion, there is no evidence in favour of breast MR imaging as a diagnostic tool to characterise equivocal findings at conventional imaging when needle-biopsy procedures can be performed, nor for the study of asymptomatic, non-high-risk women with negative conventional imaging. After a description of technical and methodological requirements, we define the indications and limitations of breast MR imaging for surveillance of high-risk women, local staging before surgery, evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast previously treated for carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome, nipple discharge and breast implants.
Breast diseases; Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
dic-2008
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/58592
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact