In patients with a complete response (CR), high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) consolidation improved progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) versus R-Alk (lenalidomide, alkylator) consolidation. Also, lenalidomide maintenance therapy enhanced PFS compared with no maintenance therapy. The survival advantage with HDT-ASCT compared with R-Alk in CR patients can be attributed to the greater minimal residual disease negativity rate induced by HDT-ASCT. Background: High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with novel agents are the best options for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, increasing the rate of complete response (CR) and prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Indeed, the achievement of a CR is a predictor of long-term survival among transplant-eligible patients. However, it is unclear whether patients reaching a CR after induction treatment could receive less intense consolidation or avoid maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods: We analyzed CR patients treated in 2 phase III trials, GIMEMA-RV-MM-PI-209 and RV-MM-EMN-441, to compare HDT-ASCT with an R-Alk (lenalidomide, alkylator) regimen as consolidation, and lenalidomide (R) maintenance with no maintenance. The primary endpoints were PFS, second PFS (PFS2), and OS from consolidation and maintenance (_m). Results: Overall, the data from 166 patients in CR were analyzed, 95 in the HDT-ASCT group and 71 in the R-Alk group. The CR patients who received HDT-ASCT had a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P =.01), PFS2 (HR, 0.46; P =.02), and OS (HR, 0.42; P =.03) compared with patients randomized to R-Alk. The survival benefit with HDT-ASCT was confirmed among all the subgroups, according to age, International Staging System (ISS stage, cytogenetic profile, and receipt of maintenance therapy. CR patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had a better PFS_m (4 years: 54% vs. 19%; HR, 0.43; P =.02) compared with those who received no maintenance. However, no difference was observed in terms of PFS2_m (4 years: 72% vs. 58%; HR, 0.83; P =.67) and OS_m (4 years: 79% vs. 72%; HR, 0.82; P =.73) with maintenance therapy. Conclusion: Even in CR patients, outcomes were improved by an intensified approach with HDT-ASCT consolidation and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy.

Treatment Intensification With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance Improves Survival Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Complete Response / R. Mina, M.T. Petrucci, P. Corradini, S. Spada, F. Patriarca, C. Cerrato, L. De Paoli, N. Pescosta, R. Ria, A. Malfitano, P. Musto, L. Baldini, T. Guglielmelli, B. Gamberi, D. Mannina, G. Benevolo, R. Zambello, A.P. Falcone, A. Palumbo, A. Nagler, V. Calafiore, R. Hájek, A. Spencer, M. Boccadoro, S. Bringhen. - In: CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA. - ISSN 2152-2650. - 18:8(2018), pp. 533-540.

Treatment Intensification With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance Improves Survival Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Complete Response

P. Corradini;L. Baldini;
2018

Abstract

In patients with a complete response (CR), high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) consolidation improved progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) versus R-Alk (lenalidomide, alkylator) consolidation. Also, lenalidomide maintenance therapy enhanced PFS compared with no maintenance therapy. The survival advantage with HDT-ASCT compared with R-Alk in CR patients can be attributed to the greater minimal residual disease negativity rate induced by HDT-ASCT. Background: High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with novel agents are the best options for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, increasing the rate of complete response (CR) and prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Indeed, the achievement of a CR is a predictor of long-term survival among transplant-eligible patients. However, it is unclear whether patients reaching a CR after induction treatment could receive less intense consolidation or avoid maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods: We analyzed CR patients treated in 2 phase III trials, GIMEMA-RV-MM-PI-209 and RV-MM-EMN-441, to compare HDT-ASCT with an R-Alk (lenalidomide, alkylator) regimen as consolidation, and lenalidomide (R) maintenance with no maintenance. The primary endpoints were PFS, second PFS (PFS2), and OS from consolidation and maintenance (_m). Results: Overall, the data from 166 patients in CR were analyzed, 95 in the HDT-ASCT group and 71 in the R-Alk group. The CR patients who received HDT-ASCT had a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P =.01), PFS2 (HR, 0.46; P =.02), and OS (HR, 0.42; P =.03) compared with patients randomized to R-Alk. The survival benefit with HDT-ASCT was confirmed among all the subgroups, according to age, International Staging System (ISS stage, cytogenetic profile, and receipt of maintenance therapy. CR patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had a better PFS_m (4 years: 54% vs. 19%; HR, 0.43; P =.02) compared with those who received no maintenance. However, no difference was observed in terms of PFS2_m (4 years: 72% vs. 58%; HR, 0.83; P =.67) and OS_m (4 years: 79% vs. 72%; HR, 0.82; P =.73) with maintenance therapy. Conclusion: Even in CR patients, outcomes were improved by an intensified approach with HDT-ASCT consolidation and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy.
ASCT; CR; Lenalidomide; MM; Treatment intensification; Hematology; Oncology; Cancer Research
Settore MED/15 - Malattie del Sangue
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2152265018303380-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 813.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
813.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/584812
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact