Background/Aims: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) is a widely used rating instrument. The Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog) includes additional tests reflecting mental speed and executive functions. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the two scales among subjects with various degrees of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Methods:In the multicentre, multinational Leukoaraiosis and Disability in the Elderly (LADIS) study, 616 non-disabled subjects between the ages of 65 and 84 were examined using MRI, the ADAS-cog and VADAS-cog. The WMH rating from the MRI divided the patients into groups of mild (n = 280), moderate (n = 187) and severe (n = 149) degrees of change. Results: Covariance analysis controlling for the effect of age and education revealed that the ADAS-cog differentiated only the mild and severe WMH groups, while the differences between all three groups were highly significant with the VADAS-cog. Conclusions:The VADAS-cog significantly differentiated between all the white matter groups. In comparison, the ADAS-cog differentiated only severe changes. Accordingly, the VADAS-cog may be a more sensitive endpoint in studies of patients with white matter load and vascular burden of the brain.

Comparison of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale and the vascular dementia assessment scale in differentiating elderly individuals with different degrees of white matter changes : The Ladis study / R. Ylikoski, H. Jokinen, P. Andersen, O. Salonen, S. Madureira, J. Ferro, F. Barkhof, W. Van Der Flier, R. Schmidt, F. Fazekas, P. Scheltens, G. Waldemar, E. Salvadori, L. Pantoni, D. Inzitari, T. Erkinjuntti. - In: DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS. - ISSN 1420-8008. - 24:2(2007), pp. 73-81.

Comparison of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale and the vascular dementia assessment scale in differentiating elderly individuals with different degrees of white matter changes : The Ladis study

E. Salvadori;L. Pantoni
;
2007

Abstract

Background/Aims: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) is a widely used rating instrument. The Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog) includes additional tests reflecting mental speed and executive functions. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the two scales among subjects with various degrees of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Methods:In the multicentre, multinational Leukoaraiosis and Disability in the Elderly (LADIS) study, 616 non-disabled subjects between the ages of 65 and 84 were examined using MRI, the ADAS-cog and VADAS-cog. The WMH rating from the MRI divided the patients into groups of mild (n = 280), moderate (n = 187) and severe (n = 149) degrees of change. Results: Covariance analysis controlling for the effect of age and education revealed that the ADAS-cog differentiated only the mild and severe WMH groups, while the differences between all three groups were highly significant with the VADAS-cog. Conclusions:The VADAS-cog significantly differentiated between all the white matter groups. In comparison, the ADAS-cog differentiated only severe changes. Accordingly, the VADAS-cog may be a more sensitive endpoint in studies of patients with white matter load and vascular burden of the brain.
cognition; neuropsychology; white matter changes; Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale cognitive subscale
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
2007
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ylikoski Dementia Geriatr Cogn Dis2007.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 199.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
199.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/573335
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact