International and constitutional law, originally distinct realms with limited areas of intersection, are getting closer and closer, particularly in the European landscape within the human rights protection field, where these mere contacts between the two systems have become intersections and overlaps. The present article will try to shed light on the still unsolved and problematic issues to which overlapping human rights protection systems give rise, by focusing on an analysis of the heterologous in vitro fertilization case, where both the Strasbourg Court and the Italian Constitutional Court delivered relevant judgments on very similar matters (ECtHR’s S.H. Judgment; Judgment No. 162/2014 from the Italian CC). Such analysis revealed useful in highlighting connections and disconnections between the different levels of protection of rights, and led us to argue that the development of a multilevel protection of rights is also, at least partially, a tale of Courts, each competing to have the last word on human rights adjudication.
|Titolo:||Intertwined but Different : The Heterolougous in Vitro Fertilization Case before the European Court of Human Rights and the Italian Constitutional Court|
|Parole Chiave:||multilevel protection of rights; European Court of Human Rights; Italian Constitutional Court; heterologous In Vitro Fertilization; margin of appreciation; consensus|
|Settore Scientifico Disciplinare:||Settore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico Comparato|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2017|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||10.1515/pof-2017-0003|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01 - Articolo su periodico|