Europe can be considered a sort of fortress of the protection of socioeconomic rights. However, this bright scenario has been unsettled by the eruption of the Eurozone crisis, which has challenged the narrative of social Europe and swept away protections for social rights in Member States grappling with sovereign debt crises such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Latvia and Romania. In these countries, austerity measures led to persistent violations of social rights, under the external constraint of conditionality regimes which involved cuts in wages, pensions and welfare services. Consequently, austerity measures were challenged in domestic and European Courts and before the ECSR. In other words, there has been a 'turn to the law', in order to give concrete effect to the potential offered by the relevant legal instruments. What has been the general attitude of the Courts and quasi-judicial bodies to actions challenging austerity measures? Since the analysis of how the Courts and other human rights bodies manage the complex and controversial balance between austerity and social rights is an excellent 'stress test' to determine the 'weight' of the latter not only in the political debate, but also in the human rights discourse, this paper will focus on the 'crisis cases' in Europe, so as to shed light on the actual level of protection for social rights.

Social Rights Protection in Europe in Times of Crisis : a Tale if Two Cities / A. Baraggia, M.E. Gennusa. - In: ICL JOURNAL. - ISSN 2306-3734. - 11:4(2017 Dec), pp. 479-506. [10.1515/icl-2017-0071]

Social Rights Protection in Europe in Times of Crisis : a Tale if Two Cities

A. Baraggia;
2017

Abstract

Europe can be considered a sort of fortress of the protection of socioeconomic rights. However, this bright scenario has been unsettled by the eruption of the Eurozone crisis, which has challenged the narrative of social Europe and swept away protections for social rights in Member States grappling with sovereign debt crises such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Latvia and Romania. In these countries, austerity measures led to persistent violations of social rights, under the external constraint of conditionality regimes which involved cuts in wages, pensions and welfare services. Consequently, austerity measures were challenged in domestic and European Courts and before the ECSR. In other words, there has been a 'turn to the law', in order to give concrete effect to the potential offered by the relevant legal instruments. What has been the general attitude of the Courts and quasi-judicial bodies to actions challenging austerity measures? Since the analysis of how the Courts and other human rights bodies manage the complex and controversial balance between austerity and social rights is an excellent 'stress test' to determine the 'weight' of the latter not only in the political debate, but also in the human rights discourse, this paper will focus on the 'crisis cases' in Europe, so as to shed light on the actual level of protection for social rights.
social rights; austerity; Courts; Committees
Settore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico Comparato
dic-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
icl-2017-0071.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.4 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/564652
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact