Background and purpose 3D printing is rapidly evolving and further assessment of materials and technique is required for clinical applications. We evaluated 3D printed boluses with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactide (PLA) at different infill percentage. Material and methods A low-cost 3D printer was used. The influence of the air inclusion within the 3D printed boluses was assessed thoroughly both with treatment planning system (TPS) and with physical measurements. For each bolus, two treatment plans were calculated with Monte Carlo algorithm, considering the computed tomography (CT) scan of the 3D printed bolus or modelling the 3D printed bolus as a virtual bolus structure with a homogeneous density. Depth dose measurements were performed with Gafchromic films. Results High infill percentage corresponds to high density and high homogeneity within bolus material. The approximation of the bolus in the TPS as a homogeneous material is satisfying for infill percentages greater than 20%. Measurements performed with PLA boluses are more comparable to the TPS calculated profiles. For boluses printed at 40% and 60% infill, the discrepancies between calculated and measured dose distribution are within 5%. Conclusions 3D printing technology allows modulating the shift of the build-up region by tuning the infill percentage of the 3D printed bolus in order to improve superficial target coverage.

Dosimetric characterization of 3D printed bolus at different infill percentage for external photon beam radiotherapy / R. Ricotti, D. Ciardo, F. Pansini, A. Bazani, S. Comi, R. Spoto, S. Noris, F. Cattani, G. Baroni, R. Orecchia, A. Vavassori, B.A. Jereczek-Fossa. - In: PHYSICA MEDICA. - ISSN 1120-1797. - 39(2017), pp. 25-32.

Dosimetric characterization of 3D printed bolus at different infill percentage for external photon beam radiotherapy

R. Spoto;R. Orecchia;B.A. Jereczek-Fossa
2017

Abstract

Background and purpose 3D printing is rapidly evolving and further assessment of materials and technique is required for clinical applications. We evaluated 3D printed boluses with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactide (PLA) at different infill percentage. Material and methods A low-cost 3D printer was used. The influence of the air inclusion within the 3D printed boluses was assessed thoroughly both with treatment planning system (TPS) and with physical measurements. For each bolus, two treatment plans were calculated with Monte Carlo algorithm, considering the computed tomography (CT) scan of the 3D printed bolus or modelling the 3D printed bolus as a virtual bolus structure with a homogeneous density. Depth dose measurements were performed with Gafchromic films. Results High infill percentage corresponds to high density and high homogeneity within bolus material. The approximation of the bolus in the TPS as a homogeneous material is satisfying for infill percentages greater than 20%. Measurements performed with PLA boluses are more comparable to the TPS calculated profiles. For boluses printed at 40% and 60% infill, the discrepancies between calculated and measured dose distribution are within 5%. Conclusions 3D printing technology allows modulating the shift of the build-up region by tuning the infill percentage of the 3D printed bolus in order to improve superficial target coverage.
3D printing; Bolus; Density; External photon beam radiotherapy; Infill percentage; Low-cost 3D printer; Biophysics; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; Physics and Astronomy (all)
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
175-Ricotti-Dosimetric characterization of 3D printed bolus-Phys Med-2017.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 3.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.1 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/554733
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact