In the last 20 years, survival among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has increased substantially with advances in lung-protective ventilation and resuscitation. Building on this success, personalizing mechanical ventilation to patient-specific physiology for enhanced lung protection will be a top research priority for the years ahead. However, the ARDS research agenda must be broader in scope. Further understanding of the heterogeneous biology, from molecular to mechanical, underlying early ARDS pathogenesis is essential to inform therapeutic discovery and tailor treatment and prevention strategies to the individual patient. The ARDSne(x)t research agenda for the next 20 years calls for bringing personalized medicine to ARDS, asking simultaneously both whether a treatment affords clinically meaningful benefit and for whom. This expanded scope necessitates standard acquisition of highly granular biological, physiological, and clinical data across studies to identify biologically distinct subgroups that may respond differently to a given intervention. Clinical trials will need to consider enrichment strategies and incorporate long-term functional outcomes. Tremendous investment in research infrastructure and global collaboration will be vital to fulfilling this agenda.

Personalized medicine for ARDS : the 2035 research agenda / J.R. Beitler, E.C. Goligher, M. Schmidt, P.M. Spieth, A. Zanella, I. Martin-Loeches, C.S. Calfee, A.B. Cavalcanti. - In: INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0342-4642. - 42:5(2016 May), pp. 756-767. [10.1007/s00134-016-4331-6]

Personalized medicine for ARDS : the 2035 research agenda

A. Zanella;
2016

Abstract

In the last 20 years, survival among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has increased substantially with advances in lung-protective ventilation and resuscitation. Building on this success, personalizing mechanical ventilation to patient-specific physiology for enhanced lung protection will be a top research priority for the years ahead. However, the ARDS research agenda must be broader in scope. Further understanding of the heterogeneous biology, from molecular to mechanical, underlying early ARDS pathogenesis is essential to inform therapeutic discovery and tailor treatment and prevention strategies to the individual patient. The ARDSne(x)t research agenda for the next 20 years calls for bringing personalized medicine to ARDS, asking simultaneously both whether a treatment affords clinically meaningful benefit and for whom. This expanded scope necessitates standard acquisition of highly granular biological, physiological, and clinical data across studies to identify biologically distinct subgroups that may respond differently to a given intervention. Clinical trials will need to consider enrichment strategies and incorporate long-term functional outcomes. Tremendous investment in research infrastructure and global collaboration will be vital to fulfilling this agenda.
acute lung injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; clinical trials; positive-pressure respiration; respiratory mechanics; ventilator-induced lung injury; clinical trials as topic; decision making; forecasting; humans; respiration, artificial; respiratory distress syndrome, adult; biomedical research; precision medicine; critical care and intensive care medicine
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
mag-2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nihms775059.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 907.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
907.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Beitler2016_Article_PersonalizedMedicineForARDSThe.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/553925
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 29
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact