Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the reference biological medicinal product. Therefore, if a patient experiences an adverse event, or a loss of efficacy, when transitioned to a biosimilar, the distribution of medical liability will be different from the case of both the originator and generics. Moreover, the case of naïve patients is different from that of non-naïve patients. In the case of naïve patients, physicians make their choice from a range of medicinal products that pose the same risk, since it is not possible to know with any certainty the patients' response to each therapeutic option until they have taken the drug. If physicians, instead, switch to a biosimilar for a patient already in treatment with the originator, they are switching from an option where the individual response is known, to an option where it is unknown. Given the evolving framework of biosimilar legislation, sharing choices with patients and obtaining their informed consent when switching to a biosimilar could represent an effective approach on the part of the prescribing physician. Moreover, a supranational database containing real-life data about patients in treatment with biological medicines, including information on the actual biological medicinal products administered, could complement the data obtained from clinical studies.
Biosimilar switching and related medical liability / P. Rocco, S. Selletti, P. Minghetti. - In: JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1752-928X. - 55(2018 Apr), pp. 93-94. [10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.018]
Biosimilar switching and related medical liability
P. Rocco
Primo
;P. MinghettiUltimo
2018
Abstract
Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the reference biological medicinal product. Therefore, if a patient experiences an adverse event, or a loss of efficacy, when transitioned to a biosimilar, the distribution of medical liability will be different from the case of both the originator and generics. Moreover, the case of naïve patients is different from that of non-naïve patients. In the case of naïve patients, physicians make their choice from a range of medicinal products that pose the same risk, since it is not possible to know with any certainty the patients' response to each therapeutic option until they have taken the drug. If physicians, instead, switch to a biosimilar for a patient already in treatment with the originator, they are switching from an option where the individual response is known, to an option where it is unknown. Given the evolving framework of biosimilar legislation, sharing choices with patients and obtaining their informed consent when switching to a biosimilar could represent an effective approach on the part of the prescribing physician. Moreover, a supranational database containing real-life data about patients in treatment with biological medicines, including information on the actual biological medicinal products administered, could complement the data obtained from clinical studies.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JournForensicLegalMed_BiosimilarSwitching_2017.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
118.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
118.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Rocco_post_print.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Post-print
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione
158 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
158 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.