Purpose of Review: An examination of the current ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS Guidelines on the management of dyslipidemias for common ground and differences. Recent Findings: There is much common ground. Both note that ASCVD is, in most people, the product of a number of risk factors, notably tobacco exposure, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, inactivity, overweight and diabetes. They stress that risk calculators can help in the assessment of risk in apparently healthy persons. Persons with established ASCVD and many with diabetes or renal impairment are at high to very high risk and warrant intensive risk factor advice. The ACC/AHA Guidelines favor the universal use of statins in all high-risk subjects. In contrast, the ESC/EAS Guidelines favor a goal approach based on total risk and baseline LDL cholesterol level. Summary: Perhaps the most important challenges are to stress similarities rather than differences and to simplify communications with both healthcare professionals and the public. Subjects with established vascular disease and renal impairment and many with diabetes are at high to very high risk and need intensive risk factor management. A risk chart or calculator is recommended to assess total risk in apparently healthy persons. The higher the risk, the more intense the risk factor management.

Management of Dyslipidemias in Europe and the USA: Same Evidence, Different Conclusions? Can We Find Common Ground? / I.M. Graham, A.L. Catapano. - In: CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS. - ISSN 1523-3782. - 19:6(2017 Jun 01). [10.1007/s11886-017-0857-7]

Management of Dyslipidemias in Europe and the USA: Same Evidence, Different Conclusions? Can We Find Common Ground?

A.L. Catapano
2017

Abstract

Purpose of Review: An examination of the current ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS Guidelines on the management of dyslipidemias for common ground and differences. Recent Findings: There is much common ground. Both note that ASCVD is, in most people, the product of a number of risk factors, notably tobacco exposure, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, inactivity, overweight and diabetes. They stress that risk calculators can help in the assessment of risk in apparently healthy persons. Persons with established ASCVD and many with diabetes or renal impairment are at high to very high risk and warrant intensive risk factor advice. The ACC/AHA Guidelines favor the universal use of statins in all high-risk subjects. In contrast, the ESC/EAS Guidelines favor a goal approach based on total risk and baseline LDL cholesterol level. Summary: Perhaps the most important challenges are to stress similarities rather than differences and to simplify communications with both healthcare professionals and the public. Subjects with established vascular disease and renal impairment and many with diabetes are at high to very high risk and need intensive risk factor management. A risk chart or calculator is recommended to assess total risk in apparently healthy persons. The higher the risk, the more intense the risk factor management.
English
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ascvd); cardiovascular risk; cholesterol; ldl cholesterol; risk factors; cholesterol, ldl; dyslipidemias; europe; humans; hydroxymethylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors; risk factors; united states; practice guidelines as topic; cardiology and cardiovascular medicine
Settore BIO/14 - Farmacologia
Review essay
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
1-giu-2017
Current Medicine Group
19
6
49
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
NON aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Management of Dyslipidemias in Europe and the USA: Same Evidence, Different Conclusions? Can We Find Common Ground? / I.M. Graham, A.L. Catapano. - In: CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS. - ISSN 1523-3782. - 19:6(2017 Jun 01). [10.1007/s11886-017-0857-7]
none
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
2
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
I.M. Graham, A.L. Catapano
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/548990
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact