Using inpatient discharge records from the Italian region of Piedmont, we estimate the impact of an increase in malpractice pressure brought about by experience-rated liability insurance on obstetric practices. Our identification strategy exploits the exogenous location of public hospitals in court districts with and without schedules for noneconomic damages. We perform difference-in-differences analysis on the entire sample and on a subsample which only considers the nearest hospitals in the neighborhood of court district boundaries. We find that the increase in medical malpractice pressure is associated with a decrease in the probability of performing a C-section from 2.3 to 3.7 percentage points (7-11.6%) with no consequences for medical complications or neonatal outcomes. The impact can be explained by a reduction in the discretion of obstetric decision-making rather than by patient cream skimming.

Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence from Italy / S. Amaral-Garcia, P. Bertoli, V. Grembi. - In: HEALTH ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1057-9230. - 24:9(2015 Sep), pp. 1050-1064. ((Intervento presentato al 23. convegno European Workshop on Econometrics and Health Economics : September, 04th - 06th tenutosi a Starnberg (Germany) nel 2014 [10.1002/hec.3210].

Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence from Italy

V. Grembi
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Using inpatient discharge records from the Italian region of Piedmont, we estimate the impact of an increase in malpractice pressure brought about by experience-rated liability insurance on obstetric practices. Our identification strategy exploits the exogenous location of public hospitals in court districts with and without schedules for noneconomic damages. We perform difference-in-differences analysis on the entire sample and on a subsample which only considers the nearest hospitals in the neighborhood of court district boundaries. We find that the increase in medical malpractice pressure is associated with a decrease in the probability of performing a C-section from 2.3 to 3.7 percentage points (7-11.6%) with no consequences for medical complications or neonatal outcomes. The impact can be explained by a reduction in the discretion of obstetric decision-making rather than by patient cream skimming.
C-sections; experience rating; medical liability insurance; scheduled damages; adult; cesarean section; female; humans; insurance, liability; italy; malpractice; models, econometric; obstetrics; practice patterns, physicians'; pregnancy; pregnancy outcome; health policy
Settore SECS-P/01 - Economia Politica
Settore SECS-P/03 - Scienza delle Finanze
set-2015
University of Munich, Department of Economy
Munich Centre for the Economics of Aging
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/545340
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact