Background Longstanding persistent (LSP) atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most challenging type of AF. In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, substrate modification and triggers ablation have been reported to improve freedom from AF in patients with LSPAF. Objectives This study sought to assess whether the empirical electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) could improve success at follow-up. Methods This was an open-label, randomized study assessing the effectiveness of empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation for the treatment of LSPAF. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation along with extensive ablation (group 1; n = 85) or extensive ablation alone (group 2; n = 88). Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included cardiac-related hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and stroke at follow-up. Results Major clinical characteristics were not different between the 2 groups. At 12-month follow-up, 48 (56%) patients in group 1 and 25 (28%) in group 2 were recurrence free after a single procedure (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence with standard ablation: 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 2.9; log-rank p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and left atrial size, standard ablation was predictive of recurrence (HR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.81; p = 0.004). During repeat procedures, empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation was performed in all patients. After an average of 1.3 procedures, cumulative success at 24-month follow-up was reported in 65 (76%) in group 1 and in 49 (56%) in group 2 (unadjusted HR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8; log-rank p = 0.003). Conclusions This randomized study showed that both after a single procedure and after redo procedures in patients with LSPAF, empirical electrical isolation of the LAA improved long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmias without increasing complications. (Effect of Empirical Left Atrial Appendage Isolation on Long-term Procedure Outcome in Patients With Persistent or Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation [BELIEF]; NCT01362738)

Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation : BELIEF Trial / L. Di Biase, J..D. Burkhardt, P. Mohanty, S. Mohanty, J.E. Sanchez, C. Trivedi, M. Güneş, Y. Gökoğlan, C. Gianni, R.P. Horton, S. Themistoclakis, G..J. Gallinghouse, S. Bailey, J.D. Zagrodzky, R.H. Hongo, S. Beheiry, P. Santangeli, M. Casella, A. Dello Russo, A. Al-Ahmad, P. Hranitzky, D. Lakkireddy, C. Tondo, A. Natale. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0735-1097. - 68:18(2016), pp. 1929-1940.

Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation : BELIEF Trial

C. Gianni;C. Tondo;
2016

Abstract

Background Longstanding persistent (LSP) atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most challenging type of AF. In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, substrate modification and triggers ablation have been reported to improve freedom from AF in patients with LSPAF. Objectives This study sought to assess whether the empirical electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) could improve success at follow-up. Methods This was an open-label, randomized study assessing the effectiveness of empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation for the treatment of LSPAF. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation along with extensive ablation (group 1; n = 85) or extensive ablation alone (group 2; n = 88). Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included cardiac-related hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and stroke at follow-up. Results Major clinical characteristics were not different between the 2 groups. At 12-month follow-up, 48 (56%) patients in group 1 and 25 (28%) in group 2 were recurrence free after a single procedure (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence with standard ablation: 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 2.9; log-rank p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and left atrial size, standard ablation was predictive of recurrence (HR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.81; p = 0.004). During repeat procedures, empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation was performed in all patients. After an average of 1.3 procedures, cumulative success at 24-month follow-up was reported in 65 (76%) in group 1 and in 49 (56%) in group 2 (unadjusted HR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8; log-rank p = 0.003). Conclusions This randomized study showed that both after a single procedure and after redo procedures in patients with LSPAF, empirical electrical isolation of the LAA improved long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmias without increasing complications. (Effect of Empirical Left Atrial Appendage Isolation on Long-term Procedure Outcome in Patients With Persistent or Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation [BELIEF]; NCT01362738)
English
Arrhythmia; Atrial Fibrillation; Non-PV trigger; Pulmonary Vein; Radiofrequency; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Time Factors; Atrial Appendage; Catheter Ablation; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Settore MED/11 - Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
2016
Elsevier
68
18
1929
1940
12
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation : BELIEF Trial / L. Di Biase, J..D. Burkhardt, P. Mohanty, S. Mohanty, J.E. Sanchez, C. Trivedi, M. Güneş, Y. Gökoğlan, C. Gianni, R.P. Horton, S. Themistoclakis, G..J. Gallinghouse, S. Bailey, J.D. Zagrodzky, R.H. Hongo, S. Beheiry, P. Santangeli, M. Casella, A. Dello Russo, A. Al-Ahmad, P. Hranitzky, D. Lakkireddy, C. Tondo, A. Natale. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0735-1097. - 68:18(2016), pp. 1929-1940.
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
24
262
Article (author)
si
L. Di Biase, J..D. Burkhardt, P. Mohanty, S. Mohanty, J.E. Sanchez, C. Trivedi, M. Güneş, Y. Gökoğlan, C. Gianni, R.P. Horton, S. Themistoclakis, G..J. Gallinghouse, S. Bailey, J.D. Zagrodzky, R.H. Hongo, S. Beheiry, P. Santangeli, M. Casella, A. Dello Russo, A. Al-Ahmad, P. Hranitzky, D. Lakkireddy, C. Tondo, A. Natale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0735109716350793-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/534508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 74
  • Scopus 322
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 258
social impact