Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Practice Parameter: The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review) / J..D. England, G..S. Gronseth, G. Franklin, G..T. Carter, L..J. Kinsella, J..A. Cohen, A..K. Asbury, K. Szigeti, J..R. Lupski, N. Latov, R..A. Lewis, P..A. Low, M..A. Fisher, D. Herrmann, J..F. Howard, G. LAURIA PINTER, R..G. Miller, M. Polydefkis, A..J. Sumner. - In: PM & R. - ISSN 1934-1482. - 1:1(2009 Jan), pp. 14-22.

Practice Parameter: The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review)

G. LAURIA PINTER;
2009

Abstract

Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.
English
autonomic nervous system; biopsy; evidence-based medicine; humans; neurologic examination; polyneuropathies; skin; rehabilitation; neurology; neurology (clinical); physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
gen-2009
Elsevier : American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
1
1
14
22
9
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
crossref
pubmed
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Practice Parameter: The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review) / J..D. England, G..S. Gronseth, G. Franklin, G..T. Carter, L..J. Kinsella, J..A. Cohen, A..K. Asbury, K. Szigeti, J..R. Lupski, N. Latov, R..A. Lewis, P..A. Low, M..A. Fisher, D. Herrmann, J..F. Howard, G. LAURIA PINTER, R..G. Miller, M. Polydefkis, A..J. Sumner. - In: PM & R. - ISSN 1934-1482. - 1:1(2009 Jan), pp. 14-22.
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
19
262
Article (author)
no
J..D. England, G..S. Gronseth, G. Franklin, G..T. Carter, L..J. Kinsella, J..A. Cohen, A..K. Asbury, K. Szigeti, J..R. Lupski, N. Latov, R..A. Lewis, P..A. Low, M..A. Fisher, D. Herrmann, J..F. Howard, G. LAURIA PINTER, R..G. Miller, M. Polydefkis, A..J. Sumner
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AAN-skin_PMR2009.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 256.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
256.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/530854
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact