The chapter shows how Kant’s ethical thought as reflected in the lectures, responds to Baumgarten’s works on moral philosophy. I argue that Kant chose Baumgarten’s textbooks for his classes for genuinely philosophical reasons. The thorough discussion of Baumgarten’s views provided Kant with important clues for developing an original position, even if mostly in opposition to Baumgarten. I illustrate this complex role of Baumgarten with a few significant examples, that also highlight some original aspects of Baumgarten’s position in comparison to Wolff’s: (1) Kant follows Baumgarten’s in focusing on obligation as the crucial issue in moral philosophy, but Kant regards Baumgarten’s account as not satisfying. (2) Baumgarten’s sharply theistic foundation of morality is rejected by Kant. (3) Kant rejects also several significant aspects of Baumgarten’s division of ethical duties, thereby revealing profound differences in their conceptions of morality.

Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy / S. Bacin (CAMBRIDGE CRITICAL GUIDES). - In: Kant’s Lectures on Ethics : A Critical Guide / [a cura di] L. Denis, O. Sensen. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015. - ISBN 9781107036314. - pp. 15-33 [10.1017/CBO9781139567527.004]

Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy

S. Bacin
2015

Abstract

The chapter shows how Kant’s ethical thought as reflected in the lectures, responds to Baumgarten’s works on moral philosophy. I argue that Kant chose Baumgarten’s textbooks for his classes for genuinely philosophical reasons. The thorough discussion of Baumgarten’s views provided Kant with important clues for developing an original position, even if mostly in opposition to Baumgarten. I illustrate this complex role of Baumgarten with a few significant examples, that also highlight some original aspects of Baumgarten’s position in comparison to Wolff’s: (1) Kant follows Baumgarten’s in focusing on obligation as the crucial issue in moral philosophy, but Kant regards Baumgarten’s account as not satisfying. (2) Baumgarten’s sharply theistic foundation of morality is rejected by Kant. (3) Kant rejects also several significant aspects of Baumgarten’s division of ethical duties, thereby revealing profound differences in their conceptions of morality.
Settore M-FIL/06 - Storia della Filosofia
2015
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bacin 2015 KantBaumgarten.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 402.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
402.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Bacin 2015 Baumgarten postprint.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 345.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
345.39 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/530520
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact