We investigated the agreement between simple indirect immunofluorescence (IF) and bright-field immunohistochemistry (BFI) on free-floating sections for intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) quantification. Fifty-five healthy subjects and 63 patients with probable small fiber neuropathy (SFN) underwent two adjacent skin biopsies at the distal leg processed by IF and BFI technique. Agreement between IENFD pairs obtained by each method was assessed by Bland-Altman testing. The area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was used to compare the discrimination ability. The diagnostic judgment was based on sex and age-adjusted normative values. IF and BFI showed good correlation (r = 0.81), with a ratio of about 2:1 and a mean difference of 5.5 ± 3.0 IENF per millimeter between paired measures, as demonstrated by linear regression and Bland-Altman test analyses. The square root transformation confirmed a Poisson distribution of the data and a fixed bias between IF and BFI measurements. The ROC curves analysis demonstrated a striking overlap between IF and BFI (0.83 and 0.82; p = 0.72). The diagnosis of SFN disagreed in only 6.7% of cases when the judgment was based on a difference of >1 IENF from 5% cut-off value. IF and BFI showed comparable diagnostic efficiency when referred to appropriate normative reference values.

Epidermal innervation morphometry by immunofluorescence and bright-field microscopy / M. Nolano, A. Biasiotta, R. Lombardi, V. Provitera, A. Stancanelli, G. Caporaso, L. Santoro, I.S.J. Merkies, A. Truini, C. Porretta-serapiglia, D. Cazzato, P. Dacci, D.F. Vitale, G. LAURIA PINTER. - In: JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. - ISSN 1085-9489. - 20:4(2015), pp. 387-391. [10.1111/jns.12146]

Epidermal innervation morphometry by immunofluorescence and bright-field microscopy

G. LAURIA PINTER
2015

Abstract

We investigated the agreement between simple indirect immunofluorescence (IF) and bright-field immunohistochemistry (BFI) on free-floating sections for intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) quantification. Fifty-five healthy subjects and 63 patients with probable small fiber neuropathy (SFN) underwent two adjacent skin biopsies at the distal leg processed by IF and BFI technique. Agreement between IENFD pairs obtained by each method was assessed by Bland-Altman testing. The area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was used to compare the discrimination ability. The diagnostic judgment was based on sex and age-adjusted normative values. IF and BFI showed good correlation (r = 0.81), with a ratio of about 2:1 and a mean difference of 5.5 ± 3.0 IENF per millimeter between paired measures, as demonstrated by linear regression and Bland-Altman test analyses. The square root transformation confirmed a Poisson distribution of the data and a fixed bias between IF and BFI measurements. The ROC curves analysis demonstrated a striking overlap between IF and BFI (0.83 and 0.82; p = 0.72). The diagnosis of SFN disagreed in only 6.7% of cases when the judgment was based on a difference of >1 IENF from 5% cut-off value. IF and BFI showed comparable diagnostic efficiency when referred to appropriate normative reference values.
immunofluorescence; immunohistochemistry; intraepidermal nerve fiber; painful neuropathy; skin biopsy; adult; aged; biopsy; epidermis; erythromelalgia; female; fluorescent antibody technique; humans; immunohistochemistry; male; microscopy; middle aged; nerve fibers; neuroscience (all); neurology (clinical)
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Nolano_et_al-2015-Journal_of_the_Peripheral_Nervous_System.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 500.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
500.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/529205
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact