Background: Evidence-based clinical research poses special barriers in the field of nutrition. The present review summarises the main barriers to research in the field of nutrition that are not common to all randomised clinical trials or trials on rare diseases and highlights opportunities for improvements. Methods: Systematic academic literature searches and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. Results: Many nutrients occur in multiple forms that differ in biological activity, and several factors can alter their bioavailability which raises barriers to their assessment. These include specific difficulties with blinding procedures, with assessments of dietary intake, and with selecting appropriate outcomes as patient-centred outcomes may occur decennia into the future. The methodologies and regulations for drug trials are, however, applicable to nutrition trials. Conclusions: Research on clinical nutrition should start by collecting clinical data systematically in databases and registries. Measurable patient-centred outcomes and appropriate study designs are needed. International cooperation and multistakeholder engagement are key for success.

Evidence-based practice within nutrition : what are the barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be dealt with? / M. Laville, B. Segrestin, M. Alligier, C. Ruano-Rodríguez, L. Serra-Majem, M. Hiesmayr, A. Schols, C. La Vecchia, Y. Boirie, A. Rath, E.A.M. Neugebauer, S. Garattini, V. Bertele, C. Kubiak, J. Demotes-Mainard, J.C. Jakobsen, S. Djurisic, C. Gluud. - In: TRIALS. - ISSN 1745-6215. - 18:1(2017 Sep 11), pp. 425.1-425.9.

Evidence-based practice within nutrition : what are the barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be dealt with?

C. La Vecchia;
2017

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based clinical research poses special barriers in the field of nutrition. The present review summarises the main barriers to research in the field of nutrition that are not common to all randomised clinical trials or trials on rare diseases and highlights opportunities for improvements. Methods: Systematic academic literature searches and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. Results: Many nutrients occur in multiple forms that differ in biological activity, and several factors can alter their bioavailability which raises barriers to their assessment. These include specific difficulties with blinding procedures, with assessments of dietary intake, and with selecting appropriate outcomes as patient-centred outcomes may occur decennia into the future. The methodologies and regulations for drug trials are, however, applicable to nutrition trials. Conclusions: Research on clinical nutrition should start by collecting clinical data systematically in databases and registries. Measurable patient-centred outcomes and appropriate study designs are needed. International cooperation and multistakeholder engagement are key for success.
Assessment; ECRIN; European clinical infrastructure network; Evidence-based clinical practice; Evidence-based medicine; Nutrition; Randomised clinical trials; Specific barriers; Medicine (miscellaneous); Pharmacology (medical)
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
11-set-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Evidence Based Practice_Laville M..pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 664.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
664.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/526289
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact