The introduction of “highly sensitive” cardiac troponin assays (hsTn) has reinforced the evidence that only serial testing incorporated in running algorithms allows a more accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. In this report, we consider the available evidence supporting the use of fast track protocols for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and compare it with the content of recently released guideline by the European Society of Cardiology, noting some uncomfortable aspects that need urgent clarification and/or revision. Firstly, the guideline drafters have to reconsider the available evidence that does not permit to assign the same class and level of evidence to the very well-validated 0–3 h algorithm and to the 0–1 h algorithm. In agreement with the validity of available data, the limitations of fast track protocols, in particular of the 0–1 h algorithm for NSTEMI rule-in, calls for caution. Secondly, as the current diagnostics guidance by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends, rapid diagnostic protocols should be performed only using well-validated hsTn; recommending the use of an assay before being commercially available is not fair and scientifically sound.
Fast track protocols using highly sensitive troponin assays for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome / S. Ferraro, A. Dolci, M. Panteghini. - In: CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE. - ISSN 1434-6621. - 55:11(2017), pp. 1683-1689. [10.1515/cclm-2017-0044]
Fast track protocols using highly sensitive troponin assays for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
A. Dolci;M. Panteghini
2017
Abstract
The introduction of “highly sensitive” cardiac troponin assays (hsTn) has reinforced the evidence that only serial testing incorporated in running algorithms allows a more accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. In this report, we consider the available evidence supporting the use of fast track protocols for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and compare it with the content of recently released guideline by the European Society of Cardiology, noting some uncomfortable aspects that need urgent clarification and/or revision. Firstly, the guideline drafters have to reconsider the available evidence that does not permit to assign the same class and level of evidence to the very well-validated 0–3 h algorithm and to the 0–1 h algorithm. In agreement with the validity of available data, the limitations of fast track protocols, in particular of the 0–1 h algorithm for NSTEMI rule-in, calls for caution. Secondly, as the current diagnostics guidance by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends, rapid diagnostic protocols should be performed only using well-validated hsTn; recommending the use of an assay before being commercially available is not fair and scientifically sound.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cclm-2017-0044.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
245.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
245.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




