Objectives: The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results: Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion: Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.

GRADE equity guidelines 4 : guidance on how to assess and address health equity within the evidence to decision process / K. Pottie, V. Welch, R. Morton, E.A. Akl, J.H. Eslava Schmalbach, V. Katikireddi, J. Singh, L. Moja, E. Lang, N. Magrini, L. Thabane, R. Stanev, E. Matovinovic, A. Snellman, M. Briel, B. Shea, P. Tugwell, H. Schunemann, G. Guyatt, P. Alonso Coello. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - 90(2017 Oct), pp. 84-91. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001]

GRADE equity guidelines 4 : guidance on how to assess and address health equity within the evidence to decision process

L. Moja;
2017

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results: Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion: Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.
English
Disadvantaged; Evidence to decision process; GRADE guidelines; Health equity; Special populations; Underserved; Epidemiology
Settore MED/42 - Igiene Generale e Applicata
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
ott-2017
Elsevier
90
84
91
8
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
pubmed
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
GRADE equity guidelines 4 : guidance on how to assess and address health equity within the evidence to decision process / K. Pottie, V. Welch, R. Morton, E.A. Akl, J.H. Eslava Schmalbach, V. Katikireddi, J. Singh, L. Moja, E. Lang, N. Magrini, L. Thabane, R. Stanev, E. Matovinovic, A. Snellman, M. Briel, B. Shea, P. Tugwell, H. Schunemann, G. Guyatt, P. Alonso Coello. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - 90(2017 Oct), pp. 84-91. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001]
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
20
262
Article (author)
no
K. Pottie, V. Welch, R. Morton, E.A. Akl, J.H. Eslava Schmalbach, V. Katikireddi, J. Singh, L. Moja, E. Lang, N. Magrini, L. Thabane, R. Stanev, E. Matovinovic, A. Snellman, M. Briel, B. Shea, P. Tugwell, H. Schunemann, G. Guyatt, P. Alonso Coello
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GRADE equity guidelines 4.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 272.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
272.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S0895435617308958-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 253.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
253.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/526063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact