This paper is based upon a comparative environmental evaluation between organic and conventional cultivation of barley, under favorable pedo-climatic conditions. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed alternatively using, as Functional Units (FUs), 1 ha of land involved in cultivation of barley to seek environmental sustainability and 1 kg of dry matter grains of produced barley to check productive efficiency. The study aims at highlighting the best solution for cultivation of barley. The topic was addressed because of the lack of comprehensive comparisons between organic and conventional management of barley production systems, which involve specific methodological assumptions (i.e. different FUs, economic allocation procedure between product and co-product). Findings from comparative LCA show that organic barley cultivation is the most environmentally sustainable solution (but not efficient in production), vice versa conventional barley cultivation is the solution most efficient in production (but not environmentally sustainable). Using 1 ha as FU, the cultivation of organic barley produces environmental impacts for 2.33 pt vs. the 2.55 pt of the cultivation of conventional barley. Vice-versa using 1 kg as FU, organic barley accounts for 3.103E-04 pt vs. the 2.396E-04 pt of conventional barley. Efficiency in production and environmental sustainability may also depend on qualitative elements (crop quality and adaptiveness to specific pedo-climatic conditions).

A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways / C. Tricase, E. Lamonaca, C. Ingrao, J. Bacenetti, A. Lo Giudice. - In: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION. - ISSN 0959-6526. - 172(2018 Jan 20), pp. 3747-3759. [10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.008]

A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways

J. Bacenetti
Penultimo
;
2018

Abstract

This paper is based upon a comparative environmental evaluation between organic and conventional cultivation of barley, under favorable pedo-climatic conditions. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed alternatively using, as Functional Units (FUs), 1 ha of land involved in cultivation of barley to seek environmental sustainability and 1 kg of dry matter grains of produced barley to check productive efficiency. The study aims at highlighting the best solution for cultivation of barley. The topic was addressed because of the lack of comprehensive comparisons between organic and conventional management of barley production systems, which involve specific methodological assumptions (i.e. different FUs, economic allocation procedure between product and co-product). Findings from comparative LCA show that organic barley cultivation is the most environmentally sustainable solution (but not efficient in production), vice versa conventional barley cultivation is the solution most efficient in production (but not environmentally sustainable). Using 1 ha as FU, the cultivation of organic barley produces environmental impacts for 2.33 pt vs. the 2.55 pt of the cultivation of conventional barley. Vice-versa using 1 kg as FU, organic barley accounts for 3.103E-04 pt vs. the 2.396E-04 pt of conventional barley. Efficiency in production and environmental sustainability may also depend on qualitative elements (crop quality and adaptiveness to specific pedo-climatic conditions).
English
Cereals; Comparative assessment; Conventional farming; Life cycle analysis; Organic farming; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; 2300; Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Settore AGR/09 - Meccanica Agraria
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
20-gen-2018
3-lug-2017
Elsevier
172
3747
3759
13
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways / C. Tricase, E. Lamonaca, C. Ingrao, J. Bacenetti, A. Lo Giudice. - In: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION. - ISSN 0959-6526. - 172(2018 Jan 20), pp. 3747-3759. [10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.008]
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
5
262
Article (author)
no
C. Tricase, E. Lamonaca, C. Ingrao, J. Bacenetti, A. Lo Giudice
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
TRICASE et al_JCP_2017.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.83 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S0959652617314294-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.76 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/525940
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 100
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 80
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact