Objective To analyse the association between oral contraceptive use and the risk of uterine fibroids. Design We considered data collected in a case-control study on risk factors for uterine fibroids. Participants We studied 843 women with uterine fibroids, whose clinical diagnosis dated back no more than two years. Controls were 1557 non-hysterectomised patients younger than 55 years admitted for acute, non-gynecological, non-hormonal, non-neoplastic conditions. Results A total of 254 cases (30.1%) and 360 controls (23.1%) reported ever using oral contraceptives: the odds ratio (OR) for ever vs never users was 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.3). The risk in current users was below unity when compared with never users (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), while ex-users had a risk of fibroids comparable with never users (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4). The risk of uterine fibroids decreased with duration of oral contraceptive use: compared with never users, the estimated OR was 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.2) in ever users for four to six years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9) for seven years or more (chi(2) trend = 4.6, P = 0.03). Conclusions Although the role of selection bias should be carefully evaluated, the present data suggest that uterine fibroids should not be considered a contra-indication for oral contraceptive use.

Use of oral contraceptives and uterine fibroids: results from a case-control study / F. Chiaffarino, F. Parazzini, C. La Vecchia, S. Marsico, M. Surace, E. Ricci. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY. - ISSN 0306-5456. - 106:8(1999 Aug), pp. 857-860. [10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08409.x]

Use of oral contraceptives and uterine fibroids: results from a case-control study

F. Parazzini;C. La Vecchia;
1999

Abstract

Objective To analyse the association between oral contraceptive use and the risk of uterine fibroids. Design We considered data collected in a case-control study on risk factors for uterine fibroids. Participants We studied 843 women with uterine fibroids, whose clinical diagnosis dated back no more than two years. Controls were 1557 non-hysterectomised patients younger than 55 years admitted for acute, non-gynecological, non-hormonal, non-neoplastic conditions. Results A total of 254 cases (30.1%) and 360 controls (23.1%) reported ever using oral contraceptives: the odds ratio (OR) for ever vs never users was 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.3). The risk in current users was below unity when compared with never users (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), while ex-users had a risk of fibroids comparable with never users (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4). The risk of uterine fibroids decreased with duration of oral contraceptive use: compared with never users, the estimated OR was 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.2) in ever users for four to six years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9) for seven years or more (chi(2) trend = 4.6, P = 0.03). Conclusions Although the role of selection bias should be carefully evaluated, the present data suggest that uterine fibroids should not be considered a contra-indication for oral contraceptive use.
age factors; biology; contraception; contraceptive methods--side effects; demographic factors; developed countries; diseases; europe; family planning; genitalia; genitalia, female; Italy; Mediterranean countries; neoplasms; neoplasms, benign; physiology; population; population characteristics; research methodology; southern Europe; urogenital system; uterus; adult--women; clinical research; fibroids; oral contraceptives--side effects; research report; risk factors; uterine effects; women; adult; case-control studies; contraceptives, oral; educational status; female; humans; leiomyoma; marriage; middle aged; premenopause; risk assessment; risk factors; uterine neoplasms
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
ago-1999
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/520228
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 72
social impact