Objectives To introduce an index (Masticatory Stability Index, MSI) to analyze the stability of chewing cycles in standardized conditions and test it in a group of patients with subclinical mild temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Design 23 subjects with mild subacute TMD and 21 healthy subjects were involved; they all responded to a questionnaire about signs and symptoms of TMD (ProTMDmulti) and underwent a myofunctional orofacial evaluation with scores, using the protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores (OMES). Their mandibular kinematics was assessed with a 3D motion capture system during deliberate unilateral gum chewing. The MSI was computed synthesizing the information contained in nine kinematics parameters into a single global figure. Patients’ and controls’ MSI were compared considering the preferred and non-preferred chewing side using a 2-way ANOVA (factors: group, side). Results Together with a lower total score of myofunctional orofacial status, the TMD group showed a reduced stability based on MSI (p < 0.05). Conclusions The MSI is an efficient method to measure the stability of the masticatory cycles. These preliminary results encourage validating the index on a larger sample. The variability in the motor behavior of chewing can impair the objectivity of its evaluations in several types of patients, including those with TMD. The MSI could be useful to complement clinical assessments, providing data for planning the rehabilitation of masticatory function in these patients.

An index for the evaluation of 3D masticatory cycles stability / C.L.P. Ferreira, M. Zago, C.M. de Felício, C. Sforza. - In: ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0003-9969. - 83(2017 Nov), pp. 124-129. [10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.07.016]

An index for the evaluation of 3D masticatory cycles stability

M. Zago
Secondo
;
C. Sforza
Ultimo
2017

Abstract

Objectives To introduce an index (Masticatory Stability Index, MSI) to analyze the stability of chewing cycles in standardized conditions and test it in a group of patients with subclinical mild temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Design 23 subjects with mild subacute TMD and 21 healthy subjects were involved; they all responded to a questionnaire about signs and symptoms of TMD (ProTMDmulti) and underwent a myofunctional orofacial evaluation with scores, using the protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores (OMES). Their mandibular kinematics was assessed with a 3D motion capture system during deliberate unilateral gum chewing. The MSI was computed synthesizing the information contained in nine kinematics parameters into a single global figure. Patients’ and controls’ MSI were compared considering the preferred and non-preferred chewing side using a 2-way ANOVA (factors: group, side). Results Together with a lower total score of myofunctional orofacial status, the TMD group showed a reduced stability based on MSI (p < 0.05). Conclusions The MSI is an efficient method to measure the stability of the masticatory cycles. These preliminary results encourage validating the index on a larger sample. The variability in the motor behavior of chewing can impair the objectivity of its evaluations in several types of patients, including those with TMD. The MSI could be useful to complement clinical assessments, providing data for planning the rehabilitation of masticatory function in these patients.
temporomandibular joint disorders; mastication; chewing cycle; kinematics; motion
Settore BIO/16 - Anatomia Umana
Settore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica e Informatica
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
nov-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
masticazione_TMD_AOB_2017-Ferreira.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 594.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
594.95 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/518646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact