This paper identifies a common political struggle behind debates on the validity and permissibility of animal experimentation, through an analysis of two recent European case studies: the Italian implementation of the European Directive 2010/63/EC regulating the use of animals in science, and the recent European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) 'Stop Vivisection'. Drawing from a historical parallel with Victorian antivivisectionism, we highlight important threads in our case studies that mark the often neglected specificities of debates on animal experimentation. From the representation of the sadistic scientist in the XIX century, to his/her claimed capture by vested interests and evasion of public scrutiny in the contemporary cases, we show that animals are not simply the focus of the debate, but also a privileged locus at which much broader issues are being raised about science, its authority, accountability and potential misalignment with public interest. By highlighting this common socio-political conflict underlying public controversies around animal experimentation, our work prompts the exploration of modes of authority and argumentation that, in establishing the usefulness of animals in science, avoid reenacting the traditional divide between epistemic and political fora.

The European politics of animal experimentation : from Victorian Britain to 'Stop Vivisection' / P. Germain, L. Chiapperino, G. Testa. - In: STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 1369-8486. - 64(2017 Jul 06), pp. 75-87. [10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.06.004]

The European politics of animal experimentation : from Victorian Britain to 'Stop Vivisection'

P. Germain
Primo
;
L. Chiapperino
Secondo
;
G. Testa
Ultimo
2017

Abstract

This paper identifies a common political struggle behind debates on the validity and permissibility of animal experimentation, through an analysis of two recent European case studies: the Italian implementation of the European Directive 2010/63/EC regulating the use of animals in science, and the recent European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) 'Stop Vivisection'. Drawing from a historical parallel with Victorian antivivisectionism, we highlight important threads in our case studies that mark the often neglected specificities of debates on animal experimentation. From the representation of the sadistic scientist in the XIX century, to his/her claimed capture by vested interests and evasion of public scrutiny in the contemporary cases, we show that animals are not simply the focus of the debate, but also a privileged locus at which much broader issues are being raised about science, its authority, accountability and potential misalignment with public interest. By highlighting this common socio-political conflict underlying public controversies around animal experimentation, our work prompts the exploration of modes of authority and argumentation that, in establishing the usefulness of animals in science, avoid reenacting the traditional divide between epistemic and political fora.
Settore M-STO/05 - Storia della Scienza e delle Tecniche
Settore BIO/13 - Biologia Applicata
Settore MED/02 - Storia della Medicina
Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
Settore BIO/11 - Biologia Molecolare
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Germain Chiapperino Testa SHPBB 2017[1].pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 649.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
649.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/518643
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact