Current management of glaucoma entails the medical, laser, or surgical reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) to a predetermined level of target IOP, which is commensurate with either stability or delayed progression of visual loss. In the published literature, the hypothesis is often made that IOP control implies a single IOP measurement over time. Although the follow-up of glaucoma patients with single IOP measurements is quick and convenient, such measurements often do not adequately reflect the untreated IOP characteristics, or indeed the quality of treated IOP control during the 24-h cycle. Since glaucoma is a 24-h disease and the damaging effect of elevated IOP is continuous, it is logical that we should aim to understand the efficacy of all treatment options throughout the 24-h period. This article first reviews the concept and value of diurnal and 24-h IOP monitoring. It then critically evaluates selected available evidence on the 24-h efficacy of medical, laser and surgical therapy options. During the past decade several controlled trials have significantly enhanced our understanding on the 24-h efficacy of all glaucoma therapy options. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate the 24-h efficacy of glaucoma therapy and the precise impact of IOP characteristics on glaucomatous progression and visual prognosis.

24-h Efficacy of Glaucoma Treatment Options / A.G.P. Konstas, L. Quaranta, B. Bozkurt, A. Katsanos, J. Garcia Feijoo, L. Rossetti, T. Shaarawy, N. Pfeiffer, S. Miglior. - In: ADVANCES IN THERAPY. - ISSN 0741-238X. - 33:4(2016 Apr), pp. 481-517. [10.1007/s12325-016-0302-0]

24-h Efficacy of Glaucoma Treatment Options

L. Rossetti;
2016

Abstract

Current management of glaucoma entails the medical, laser, or surgical reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) to a predetermined level of target IOP, which is commensurate with either stability or delayed progression of visual loss. In the published literature, the hypothesis is often made that IOP control implies a single IOP measurement over time. Although the follow-up of glaucoma patients with single IOP measurements is quick and convenient, such measurements often do not adequately reflect the untreated IOP characteristics, or indeed the quality of treated IOP control during the 24-h cycle. Since glaucoma is a 24-h disease and the damaging effect of elevated IOP is continuous, it is logical that we should aim to understand the efficacy of all treatment options throughout the 24-h period. This article first reviews the concept and value of diurnal and 24-h IOP monitoring. It then critically evaluates selected available evidence on the 24-h efficacy of medical, laser and surgical therapy options. During the past decade several controlled trials have significantly enhanced our understanding on the 24-h efficacy of all glaucoma therapy options. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate the 24-h efficacy of glaucoma therapy and the precise impact of IOP characteristics on glaucomatous progression and visual prognosis.
Pharmacology (medical); Medicine (all); 24-h efficacy; 24-h intraocular pressure control; Circadian intraocular pressure characteristics; Diurnal intraocular pressure; Glaucoma therapy options; Intraocular pressure monitoring; Ophthalmology
Settore MED/30 - Malattie Apparato Visivo
apr-2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.1007_s12325-016-0302-0.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 768.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
768.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/516247
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact