In the current literature, Saharan green-colored stone beads are identified with the term emeraude garamantique, while several archaeological investigations on Garamantian contexts referred to them as amazonite. Moreover, according to the hypothesis proposed by Monod, authors identify the only source of amazonite to be the pegmatite swarm at Eghei Zuma (northern Tibesti, Libya). To check this assumption, we characterized the composition of green-colored stone beads found at Fewet, a Garamantian site (2nd century BC – 1st century AD) in the Libyan Sahara. We performed electron microprobe analyses on stone beads from Fewet and ethnographic contexts of Mali, Mauritania, and Sudan. Furthermore, lacking a regional database on amazonite to compare the geochemical properties of archaeological beads, we analyzed amazonite crystals from several African pegmatites, including samples from Eghei Zuma. The results show that green-colored stone beads from Fewet consist of serpentinite and amazonite. The K/Rb versus Rb diagram reveals that the source of the amazonite from Fewet could not be the pegmatite at Eghei Zuma. The raw material for amazonite beads traded in Garamantian times originated from Egypt and Mauritania. We discuss the archaeological implications of our results, which concerns the directions of ancient trade routes for elite goods in Garamantian times.

Searching for the Garamantian Emerald : reconsidering the green-coloured stone beads trade in the ancient Sahara / A. Zerboni, P. Vignola, M.C. Gatto, A. Risplendente, L. Mori. - In: CANADIAN MINERALOGIST. - ISSN 0008-4476. - 55:4(2017), pp. 651-668. [10.3749/canmin.1600052]

Searching for the Garamantian Emerald : reconsidering the green-coloured stone beads trade in the ancient Sahara

A. Zerboni;A. Risplendente;
2017

Abstract

In the current literature, Saharan green-colored stone beads are identified with the term emeraude garamantique, while several archaeological investigations on Garamantian contexts referred to them as amazonite. Moreover, according to the hypothesis proposed by Monod, authors identify the only source of amazonite to be the pegmatite swarm at Eghei Zuma (northern Tibesti, Libya). To check this assumption, we characterized the composition of green-colored stone beads found at Fewet, a Garamantian site (2nd century BC – 1st century AD) in the Libyan Sahara. We performed electron microprobe analyses on stone beads from Fewet and ethnographic contexts of Mali, Mauritania, and Sudan. Furthermore, lacking a regional database on amazonite to compare the geochemical properties of archaeological beads, we analyzed amazonite crystals from several African pegmatites, including samples from Eghei Zuma. The results show that green-colored stone beads from Fewet consist of serpentinite and amazonite. The K/Rb versus Rb diagram reveals that the source of the amazonite from Fewet could not be the pegmatite at Eghei Zuma. The raw material for amazonite beads traded in Garamantian times originated from Egypt and Mauritania. We discuss the archaeological implications of our results, which concerns the directions of ancient trade routes for elite goods in Garamantian times.
green-colored stone beads; Amazonite; Eghei Zuma; geochemical analysis; Garamantes; Saharan trade routes
Settore GEO/04 - Geografia Fisica e Geomorfologia
Settore GEO/09 - Georisorse Miner.Appl.Mineral.-Petrogr.per l'amb.e i Beni Cul
Settore L-ANT/01 - Preistoria e Protostoria
2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
651.full.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.44 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/508798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact