An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars – levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan – and biosugars – arabitol, glucose and mannitol – in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such analyses was investigated on twenty-six PM (particulate matter)ambient filters, three synthetic PM filters and three aqueous standard solutions. An acceptable interlaboratory variability was found, determined as the mean relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the results from the participating laboratories, with the mean RSD% values ranging from 25% to 46% and decreasing with increasing sugar concentration. The investigated methods show good accuracy, evaluated as the percentage error (ε%) related to mean values, since method biases ranged within ±20% for most of the analytes measured in the different laboratories. The detailed investigation (ANOVA analysis at p < 0.05) of the contribution of each laboratory to the total variability and the measurement accuracy shows that comparable results are generated by the different methods, despite the great diversity in terms of extraction conditions, chromatographic separation - −more recent LC (liquid chromatography) and EC (exchange chromatography) methods compared to more widespread GC (gas chromatography) - and detection systems, namely PAD (pulsed amperometric detection) or mass spectrometry.

Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugarsin atmospheric aerosol / M.C. Pietrogrande, E. Barbaro, M.C. Bove, G. Clauser, C. Colombi, L. Corbella, E. Cuccia, S. Dalla Torre, S. Decesari, P. Fermo, A. Gambaro, V. Gianelle, P. Ielpo, R. Larcher, P. Lazzeri, D. Massabò, G. Melchionna, T. Nardin, M. Paglione, C. Perrino, P. Prati, M. Visentin, N. Zanca, R. Zangrando. - In: CHEMOSPHERE. - ISSN 0045-6535. - 184(2017 Oct), pp. 269-277. ((Intervento presentato al 18. convegno ICHMET : International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment : Ghent University, September, 12-15 tenutosi a Ghent (Belgium) nel 2016.

Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugarsin atmospheric aerosol

L. Corbella;P. Fermo;
2017

Abstract

An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars – levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan – and biosugars – arabitol, glucose and mannitol – in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such analyses was investigated on twenty-six PM (particulate matter)ambient filters, three synthetic PM filters and three aqueous standard solutions. An acceptable interlaboratory variability was found, determined as the mean relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the results from the participating laboratories, with the mean RSD% values ranging from 25% to 46% and decreasing with increasing sugar concentration. The investigated methods show good accuracy, evaluated as the percentage error (ε%) related to mean values, since method biases ranged within ±20% for most of the analytes measured in the different laboratories. The detailed investigation (ANOVA analysis at p < 0.05) of the contribution of each laboratory to the total variability and the measurement accuracy shows that comparable results are generated by the different methods, despite the great diversity in terms of extraction conditions, chromatographic separation - −more recent LC (liquid chromatography) and EC (exchange chromatography) methods compared to more widespread GC (gas chromatography) - and detection systems, namely PAD (pulsed amperometric detection) or mass spectrometry.
PM; levoglucosan; biomass burning
Settore CHIM/01 - Chimica Analitica
ott-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
manuscript_chem.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 615.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
615.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/503724
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact