Wittgenstein’s remarks on psychoanalysis can be viewed as a critical ap- proach to Freudian speculation, but this is not our concern in the present essay. Here we want to examine the analogy, which Wittgenstein acknowledges, between his own understanding of philosophy and the style of thinking that characterizes psychoanalytic therapy. Both psychoanalysis and philosophy appear as precious pursuits and, in different respects, as dangerous enterprises. In Wittgenstein’s eyes they are to be appreciated as ‘therapeutic activities’. However, when they try to become theories with scientific ambitions, they turn out to be dubious or even harmful spiritual offshoots. In the present essay we explore three features that are essential to such analogy. 1) Both philosophy and psychoanalysis appear as thera- pies that make use of language: they are ‘treatments’ that take place at the level of reasons, and not causes. 2) Both treatments are attempts to tackle motivational conflicts, which are at the roots of specific forms of ‘mental unease’. 3) The rel- evant motivational confl icts are characterized by being inscrutable as to their real grounds, and their harmfulness is proportional to their inscrutable (‘unconscious’) character. Our purpose is to discuss this qualifi ed analogy between philosophy and psychoanalysis in order to improve our understanding of the role of metaphysics in human reflection.

On Wittgenstein’s Analogy between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis / A. Zhok. - In: FILOSOFIA. - ISSN 0015-1823. - 61 (4. Serie):(2016), pp. 219-238.

On Wittgenstein’s Analogy between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis

A. Zhok
2016

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s remarks on psychoanalysis can be viewed as a critical ap- proach to Freudian speculation, but this is not our concern in the present essay. Here we want to examine the analogy, which Wittgenstein acknowledges, between his own understanding of philosophy and the style of thinking that characterizes psychoanalytic therapy. Both psychoanalysis and philosophy appear as precious pursuits and, in different respects, as dangerous enterprises. In Wittgenstein’s eyes they are to be appreciated as ‘therapeutic activities’. However, when they try to become theories with scientific ambitions, they turn out to be dubious or even harmful spiritual offshoots. In the present essay we explore three features that are essential to such analogy. 1) Both philosophy and psychoanalysis appear as thera- pies that make use of language: they are ‘treatments’ that take place at the level of reasons, and not causes. 2) Both treatments are attempts to tackle motivational conflicts, which are at the roots of specific forms of ‘mental unease’. 3) The rel- evant motivational confl icts are characterized by being inscrutable as to their real grounds, and their harmfulness is proportional to their inscrutable (‘unconscious’) character. Our purpose is to discuss this qualifi ed analogy between philosophy and psychoanalysis in order to improve our understanding of the role of metaphysics in human reflection.
Wittgenstein; metaphysics; psychoanalysis; motivational conflict; unconscious
Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
Settore M-FIL/01 - Filosofia Teoretica
2016
http://mimesisedizioni.it/riviste/filosofia/filosofia-quarta-serie-anno-lxi-2016.html
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Filosofia_2016_Zhok.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 178.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
178.6 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/493845
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact