In the history of historiography, the studies devoted to the presence of a skeptical inspiration in medieval philosophy follow an interesting line of development that seems to repeat some steps characteristic of skepticism itself. In particular the scholars have considered Nicholas of Autrecourt from different points of view that emphasized, from time to time, some special aspects: from the beginning of the twentieth century, when he appears as representative of a metaphysics that questions the Aristotelianism and the great synthesis of scholastic philosophy, up to recent studies that analyze in detail his epistemology. Skepticism can be considered as combination of moments logically connected even if not in a systematic way; in the same manner the thought of Nicholas presents aspects not systematically organized, that should be emphasized highlighting his different argumentation strategies.

Scetticismo e retorica in Nicola d'Autrecourt / M. Parodi (MICROLOGUS' LIBRARY). - In: Forme e oggetti della conoscenza nel XIV secolo : studi in ricordo di Maria Elena Reina / [a cura di] L. Bianchi, C. Crisciani. - [s.l] : Sismel, 2014. - ISBN 9788884505699. - pp. 371-390

Scetticismo e retorica in Nicola d'Autrecourt

M. Parodi
2014

Abstract

In the history of historiography, the studies devoted to the presence of a skeptical inspiration in medieval philosophy follow an interesting line of development that seems to repeat some steps characteristic of skepticism itself. In particular the scholars have considered Nicholas of Autrecourt from different points of view that emphasized, from time to time, some special aspects: from the beginning of the twentieth century, when he appears as representative of a metaphysics that questions the Aristotelianism and the great synthesis of scholastic philosophy, up to recent studies that analyze in detail his epistemology. Skepticism can be considered as combination of moments logically connected even if not in a systematic way; in the same manner the thought of Nicholas presents aspects not systematically organized, that should be emphasized highlighting his different argumentation strategies.
Settore M-FIL/06 - Storia della Filosofia
2014
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Parodi Chimera 2010.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 227.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/492489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact