With judgment no. 52 of 2016, the Constitutional Court granted the “conflict of powers” appeal raised by the Government against the Supreme Court decision of 2013, in which it had been established the political, discretionary and non-justiciable act by which the Government refuses to start negotiations for the conclusion of an agreement pursuant to art. 8.3 Const. This essay reconstructs the lines of argument of the Constitutional Court, analyzing the doctrine that has commented the judgment no. 52, highlighting the key steps of the decision.
Una nuova «politica ecclesiastica» della Corte costituzionale, tra rigore teorico e conservatorismo pratico? : le prime reazioni della dottrina alla sentenza n. 52/2016 / M. Toscano. - In: QUADERNI DI DIRITTO E POLITICA ECCLESIASTICA. - ISSN 1122-0392. - 19:3(2016), pp. 751-765. [10.1440/85618]
Una nuova «politica ecclesiastica» della Corte costituzionale, tra rigore teorico e conservatorismo pratico? : le prime reazioni della dottrina alla sentenza n. 52/2016
M. Toscano
2016
Abstract
With judgment no. 52 of 2016, the Constitutional Court granted the “conflict of powers” appeal raised by the Government against the Supreme Court decision of 2013, in which it had been established the political, discretionary and non-justiciable act by which the Government refuses to start negotiations for the conclusion of an agreement pursuant to art. 8.3 Const. This essay reconstructs the lines of argument of the Constitutional Court, analyzing the doctrine that has commented the judgment no. 52, highlighting the key steps of the decision.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Toscano - Versione conforme al cartaceo.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
912.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
912.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.