Whether social rights are genuine rights and whether they enjoy the same status as civil rights are controversial questions. As the essay suggests, rather than through conceptual and definitional arguments, similar questions should be addressed by investigating the normative implications of endorsing or, alternatively, rejecting the parity between social and civil rights. References to how they conceive individuals - as autonomous agents or as primarily characterized by needs and interests - enable to comparatively assess the contending positions. As the comparison shows, the position attributing priority to civil rights proves more convincing: it does not equate violations of civil rights and violations of social rights and it assigns rights with an intrinsic value, thus better vindicating their special normative force. The essay clarifies that this conclusion does not imply denying the value of the goods ordinarily guaranteed through social rights, which can be better and more fairly granted, as the essay contends, by a theory of justice focusing on redistributive duties, rather than by a theory of rights.

Quali diritti sono veri diritti? Diritti sociali e diritti civili a confronto / F. Pasquali. - In: RAGION PRATICA. - ISSN 1720-2396. - 47:2(2016 Dec), pp. 553-564.

Quali diritti sono veri diritti? Diritti sociali e diritti civili a confronto

PASQUALI, FRANCESCA
2016-12

Abstract

Whether social rights are genuine rights and whether they enjoy the same status as civil rights are controversial questions. As the essay suggests, rather than through conceptual and definitional arguments, similar questions should be addressed by investigating the normative implications of endorsing or, alternatively, rejecting the parity between social and civil rights. References to how they conceive individuals - as autonomous agents or as primarily characterized by needs and interests - enable to comparatively assess the contending positions. As the comparison shows, the position attributing priority to civil rights proves more convincing: it does not equate violations of civil rights and violations of social rights and it assigns rights with an intrinsic value, thus better vindicating their special normative force. The essay clarifies that this conclusion does not imply denying the value of the goods ordinarily guaranteed through social rights, which can be better and more fairly granted, as the essay contends, by a theory of justice focusing on redistributive duties, rather than by a theory of rights.
diritti sociali; diritti civili; violazioni di diritti; autonomia; benessere
Settore SPS/01 - Filosofia Politica
RAGION PRATICA
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1720-2396-26291-18.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 103.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
103.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/479055
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact