In most parliamentary systems, the dates of the elections are not fixed. This gives an incumbent prime minister, party, or cabinet a significant advantage. However, the strategic timing of an election is an opportunistic act that might disappoint at least a fraction of the electorate. Once at the polls, some voters could punish the governing parties for their opportunistic choice. I call these lost votes the electoral cost of calling an early election. How many votes a governing party looses after the decision of calling a snap election? Surprisingly, this topic is seriously understudied in the literature. In this paper, I will provide a theretical explanation of this cost, linking the literature on cabinet termination with the literature on valence issues in spatial models.
Calling a Snap Election is a Valence Issue: Measuring the Electoral Cost of Election Timing / I. Bongiorni. ((Intervento presentato al convegno ECPR tenutosi a Oslo nel 2017.
Calling a Snap Election is a Valence Issue: Measuring the Electoral Cost of Election Timing
I. BongiorniPrimo
2015
Abstract
In most parliamentary systems, the dates of the elections are not fixed. This gives an incumbent prime minister, party, or cabinet a significant advantage. However, the strategic timing of an election is an opportunistic act that might disappoint at least a fraction of the electorate. Once at the polls, some voters could punish the governing parties for their opportunistic choice. I call these lost votes the electoral cost of calling an early election. How many votes a governing party looses after the decision of calling a snap election? Surprisingly, this topic is seriously understudied in the literature. In this paper, I will provide a theretical explanation of this cost, linking the literature on cabinet termination with the literature on valence issues in spatial models.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.