The paper discusses Hölderlin’s “first letter” to Casimir Ulrich Böhlendorff (December 4th, 1801) in two steps. First, textual and contextual elements are presented, so as to draw attention to the intellectual network in which the epistolary dialogue as “psyche among friends” is settled (1). A thorough, close reading of the letter is then given, focusing on both argumentative macro-structures and micro-analytical issues (2); a closing paragraph briefly looks at the implications of the case study for a better insight into Hölderlin’s late translating/rewriting and commenting of Sophocles. The main claim of the paper is that the poet’s well-known moving away from neoclassicist normative aesthetics towards an original, “paradoxical” solution of the ancient-modern-question (Überwindung des Klassizismus, Szondi) is consistently linked to the epistolary frame in which the alleged theoretical digression is inserted, i.e. Hölderlin’s reading of Böhlendorff’s drama Fernando, his understanding of the mutual experimental work on a modern tragedy as a “free use of the proper”, and the poet’s concern about his crucial decision to leave Germany.

«Es klingt paradox» : Hölderlin, Böhlendorff e il teatro moderno / M. Castellari. - In: STUDIA THEODISCA. - ISSN 1593-2478. - (2016), pp. 119-144. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Le lettere di Friedrich Hölderlin: filosofia e poesia=Die Briefe Friedrich Hölderlins: Philosophie und Dichtung tenutosi a Udine nel 2015 [10.13130/1593-2478/8062].

«Es klingt paradox» : Hölderlin, Böhlendorff e il teatro moderno

M. Castellari
2016

Abstract

The paper discusses Hölderlin’s “first letter” to Casimir Ulrich Böhlendorff (December 4th, 1801) in two steps. First, textual and contextual elements are presented, so as to draw attention to the intellectual network in which the epistolary dialogue as “psyche among friends” is settled (1). A thorough, close reading of the letter is then given, focusing on both argumentative macro-structures and micro-analytical issues (2); a closing paragraph briefly looks at the implications of the case study for a better insight into Hölderlin’s late translating/rewriting and commenting of Sophocles. The main claim of the paper is that the poet’s well-known moving away from neoclassicist normative aesthetics towards an original, “paradoxical” solution of the ancient-modern-question (Überwindung des Klassizismus, Szondi) is consistently linked to the epistolary frame in which the alleged theoretical digression is inserted, i.e. Hölderlin’s reading of Böhlendorff’s drama Fernando, his understanding of the mutual experimental work on a modern tragedy as a “free use of the proper”, and the poet’s concern about his crucial decision to leave Germany.
Friedrich Hölderlin; Casimir Ulrich Böhlendorff; Asthetics; Poetics; Tragedy; Theatre; Paradox; Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns; Neoclassicism; Modernism; Epistolary
Settore L-LIN/13 - Letteratura Tedesca
2016
Hölderlin-Gesellschaft Tübingen
Hölderlin-Gesellschaft Tübingen (sezione italiana)
Università degli Studi di Udine
Goethe-Institut Triest
Consolato Generale della Repubblica Federale di Germania di Milano
Fondazione CRUP
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Castellari_Hölderlin_Böhlendorff_2016.PDF

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 258.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
258.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/473260
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact