Purpose: In the past few years, the use of fresh frozen bone (FFB) grafts has significantly increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction of alveolar bone using femoral head and iliac crest FFB grafts. Materials and Methods: The study included 10 patients who need endosseous implant insertion in severe atrophic maxillae. The patients were treated with FFB grafts collected from the femoral head or iliac crest. Bone regeneration was evaluated 6 months after surgery by macroscopic and microscopic analyses. Results: Our results showed good regenerative capacity, both with the FFB from the femoral head and iliac crest. In particular, similar percentages of new-bone formation and graft residual were observed, whereas differences between the percentage of total bone (higher for the iliac crest) and the percentage of non-mineralized tissue (higher for the femoral head) were present. A significantly higher percentage of CD34-positive vessels in the FFB allograft from the femoral head than in the iliac crest were observed. Conclusions: These findings suggest that FFB allografts could represent a reliable option in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Nevertheless, differences between the use of femoral head or iliac crest bone allografts linked with their different structures should be considered for a more effective surgery.

Histomorphometrical Evaluation of Fresh Frozen Bone Allografts for Alveolar Bone Reconstruction : Preliminary Cases Comparing Femoral Head with Iliac Crest Grafts / B. Buffoli, R. Boninsegna, R. Rezzani, P.P. Poli, F. Santoro, L.F. Rodella. - In: CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH. - ISSN 1523-0899. - 15:6(2013), pp. 791-798.

Histomorphometrical Evaluation of Fresh Frozen Bone Allografts for Alveolar Bone Reconstruction : Preliminary Cases Comparing Femoral Head with Iliac Crest Grafts

B. Buffoli;R. Boninsegna
Secondo
;
P.P. Poli;F. Santoro
Penultimo
;
2013

Abstract

Purpose: In the past few years, the use of fresh frozen bone (FFB) grafts has significantly increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction of alveolar bone using femoral head and iliac crest FFB grafts. Materials and Methods: The study included 10 patients who need endosseous implant insertion in severe atrophic maxillae. The patients were treated with FFB grafts collected from the femoral head or iliac crest. Bone regeneration was evaluated 6 months after surgery by macroscopic and microscopic analyses. Results: Our results showed good regenerative capacity, both with the FFB from the femoral head and iliac crest. In particular, similar percentages of new-bone formation and graft residual were observed, whereas differences between the percentage of total bone (higher for the iliac crest) and the percentage of non-mineralized tissue (higher for the femoral head) were present. A significantly higher percentage of CD34-positive vessels in the FFB allograft from the femoral head than in the iliac crest were observed. Conclusions: These findings suggest that FFB allografts could represent a reliable option in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Nevertheless, differences between the use of femoral head or iliac crest bone allografts linked with their different structures should be considered for a more effective surgery.
Allograft; Alveolar bone remodeling; Angiogenesis; Adult; Female; Femur Head; Humans; Ilium; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Middle Aged; Transplantation, Homologous; Bone Transplantation; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dentistry (all); Oral Surgery; Medicine (all)
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
2013
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Buffoli_et_al-2013-Clinical_Implant_Dentistry_and_Related_Research.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 581.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
581.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/467634
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact