Objective Nickel is the most common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Because nickel restriction is commonly imposed on many patients with the only earlobe ACD to nickel hypersensitivity, the aim of this study was to identify the role of occasional and extended oral nickel exposure in these patients. Design This is a case-control study Subjects Thirty-four outpatients, previously diagnosed as monosensitized to nickel, suffering from earlobe dermatitis were enrolled; 11 of them showed active dermatitis. The control group consisted of six healthy (non-nickel-sensitive) subjects. Interventions High oral nickel challenge (20 mg) and protracted oral challenge (1 mg once a day). Observation period: 6 weeks. Results Clinical earlobe lesions were not affected by a high oral nickel intake nor by a protracted oral challenge. Conclusions Dietary nickel restriction seems to be useless in patients with earlobe ACD due to nickel hypersensitivity.
Nickel earlobe dermatitis and clinical non-relevance of the oral exposure / F. Di Berardino, D. Alpini, A. Cesarani. - In: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY. - ISSN 0926-9959. - 22:10(2008), pp. 1215-1217. [10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02779.x]
Nickel earlobe dermatitis and clinical non-relevance of the oral exposure
F. Di BerardinoPrimo
;A. CesaraniUltimo
2008
Abstract
Objective Nickel is the most common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Because nickel restriction is commonly imposed on many patients with the only earlobe ACD to nickel hypersensitivity, the aim of this study was to identify the role of occasional and extended oral nickel exposure in these patients. Design This is a case-control study Subjects Thirty-four outpatients, previously diagnosed as monosensitized to nickel, suffering from earlobe dermatitis were enrolled; 11 of them showed active dermatitis. The control group consisted of six healthy (non-nickel-sensitive) subjects. Interventions High oral nickel challenge (20 mg) and protracted oral challenge (1 mg once a day). Observation period: 6 weeks. Results Clinical earlobe lesions were not affected by a high oral nickel intake nor by a protracted oral challenge. Conclusions Dietary nickel restriction seems to be useless in patients with earlobe ACD due to nickel hypersensitivity.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
nichel.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
61.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
61.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.