Vitrification is an established and successful technique for preserving human oocytes and embryos. It can be achieved either by direct (open systems) or indirect (closed systems) contact with liquid nitrogen and there is not a consensus on the optimum vitrification protocol. Scientific societies agree that there are no particular concerns regarding vitrification other than direct contact with a non sterile product. Moreover, European directives pose the need for aseptic procedures as a critical point. Therefore, several strategies have been developed in order to avoid the risk of contamination, including closed devices and liquid nitrogen sterilization. There have been concerns with closed vitrification devices that a reduction in cooling rate compared to open vitrification systems due to thermal insulation of samples would cause ice crystal formation resulting in impaired results. It has been proposed that a correct exposure to cryoprotective agents before closed vitrification and a high warming rate can adequately compensate the reduction in cooling rates. This reduction in cooling rate can also be prevented with direct plunging of samples in sterile liquid nitrogen followed by hermetical cryostorage (semi-closed system). Studies comparing different protocols suggest that aseptic vitrification is an effective strategy both for embryos and oocytes.

Closed versus open vitrification systems for human oocytes and embryos : a mini-review / A. Paffoni, S. Ferrari, L. Restelli. - In: CURRENT TRENDS IN CLINICAL EMBRYOLOGY. - ISSN 2385-2836. - 1:1(2014), pp. 12-16. [10.11138/cce/2014.1.1.012]

Closed versus open vitrification systems for human oocytes and embryos : a mini-review

A. Paffoni
Primo
;
S. Ferrari
Secondo
;
2014

Abstract

Vitrification is an established and successful technique for preserving human oocytes and embryos. It can be achieved either by direct (open systems) or indirect (closed systems) contact with liquid nitrogen and there is not a consensus on the optimum vitrification protocol. Scientific societies agree that there are no particular concerns regarding vitrification other than direct contact with a non sterile product. Moreover, European directives pose the need for aseptic procedures as a critical point. Therefore, several strategies have been developed in order to avoid the risk of contamination, including closed devices and liquid nitrogen sterilization. There have been concerns with closed vitrification devices that a reduction in cooling rate compared to open vitrification systems due to thermal insulation of samples would cause ice crystal formation resulting in impaired results. It has been proposed that a correct exposure to cryoprotective agents before closed vitrification and a high warming rate can adequately compensate the reduction in cooling rates. This reduction in cooling rate can also be prevented with direct plunging of samples in sterile liquid nitrogen followed by hermetical cryostorage (semi-closed system). Studies comparing different protocols suggest that aseptic vitrification is an effective strategy both for embryos and oocytes.
vitrification; liquid nitrogen; hermetical cryostorage; closed carrier; oocyte cryopreservation
Settore BIO/13 - Biologia Applicata
2014
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CCE.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 599.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
599.52 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/455320
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact