Growing distrust in government is accompanied by new opportunities for civic involvement through online technological platforms. LiquidFeedback is one of the most interesting, as it embeds innovative features to support online deliberative processes. Designed as an intranet tool for closed, homogeneous groups, the software has also been used in large civic contexts involving citizens at large. This paper presents and analyses two large-scale deliberation projects where thousands of Italian citizens used the LiquidFeedback platform. The analysis aims to understand how well this software serves as a platform for people to gather ideas, draft proposals collaboratively, and then rate them by degree of consensus. We consider the political context for these field cases and their socio-technical design choices, look at how LiquidFeedback enables citizen participation, discuss politicians’ accountability in terms of online activity, and report participants’ assessment of the two projects. Our analysis adapts existing frameworks that match different participation styles to profiles of activity in online communities

LiquidFeedback in Large-scale Civic Contexts : Framing Multiple Styles of Online Participation / G. Bertone, F. De Cindio, S. Stortone. - In: JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ORGANIZATIONS. - ISSN 2471-8351. - 2:1(2015), pp. 1-26.

LiquidFeedback in Large-scale Civic Contexts : Framing Multiple Styles of Online Participation

G. Bertone
Primo
;
F. De Cindio
Secondo
;
S. Stortone
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Growing distrust in government is accompanied by new opportunities for civic involvement through online technological platforms. LiquidFeedback is one of the most interesting, as it embeds innovative features to support online deliberative processes. Designed as an intranet tool for closed, homogeneous groups, the software has also been used in large civic contexts involving citizens at large. This paper presents and analyses two large-scale deliberation projects where thousands of Italian citizens used the LiquidFeedback platform. The analysis aims to understand how well this software serves as a platform for people to gather ideas, draft proposals collaboratively, and then rate them by degree of consensus. We consider the political context for these field cases and their socio-technical design choices, look at how LiquidFeedback enables citizen participation, discuss politicians’ accountability in terms of online activity, and report participants’ assessment of the two projects. Our analysis adapts existing frameworks that match different participation styles to profiles of activity in online communities
LiquidFeedback; large-scale ideation and deliberation; online deliberation; democracy; civic participation
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
http://www2.mitre.org/public/jsmo/pdfs/02-01-liquid-feedback.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bertone_etal(2015)_liquidfeedback.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 912.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
912.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/452849
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact