Currently, the optimal management strategy for chronic type B aortic dissections (CBAD) is unknown. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to compare results of open surgical repair (OSR), standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or branched and fenestrated TEVAR (BEVAR/FEVAR) for CBAD.

Contemporary Management Strategies for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections : A Systematic Review / A.V. Kamman, H.W.L. de Beaufort, G.H.W. van Bogerijen, F.J.H. Nauta, R.H. Heijmen, F.L. Moll, J.A. van Herwaarden, S. Trimarchi. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 11:5(2016 May 04).

Contemporary Management Strategies for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections : A Systematic Review

S. Trimarchi
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

Currently, the optimal management strategy for chronic type B aortic dissections (CBAD) is unknown. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to compare results of open surgical repair (OSR), standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or branched and fenestrated TEVAR (BEVAR/FEVAR) for CBAD.
Settore MED/22 - Chirurgia Vascolare
4-mag-2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016-PLOSONE CBAD Review_Trimarchi.PDF

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 744.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
744.06 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/450639
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact