Objective: To investigate how the distance between narrow implants and adjacent teeth influences the marginal bone levels (MBL) up to 3 years after placement. Material and Methods: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical study was designed to include patients missing 12, 22, 32, 31, 41 or 42 teeth. Implants of 3.0 mm diameter and different lengths were used in the study. One-stage surgery was performed and healing abutments placed during the 6-10 weeks healing period. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at implant installation, loading, and at the 6, 12, 24 and 36-months follow-up visits. Results: Eighty-three implants were placed in 59 patients. A total of 48 implants were placed in narrow implant-to-tooth spaces (percentile 25, 0.83(0.25) mm), 80 in regular spaces (percentile 25 < x < 75, 1.59(0.26) mm) and 47 in wide spaces (percentile 75, 2.61(0.51) mm). Implant MBL change from restoration delivery to 36 months was of 0.50(0.79), 0.50(0.98) and 0.00(0.55) mm in the narrow, regular and wide distance groups (P = 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test). Changes in MBL on the adjacent teeth were not significant. Conclusion: The distance between narrow-diameter implants and the adjacent teeth does not influence the marginal bone levels neither at the implant or the tooth side. In this study, less marginal bone loss occurred in the narrower spaces.

The influence of the distance between narrow implants and the adjacent teeth on marginal bone levels / P. Galindo Moreno, M. Padial Molina, P. Nilsson, P. King, N. Worsaae, A. Schramm, C. Maiorana. - In: CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. - ISSN 0905-7161. - (2016). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1111/clr.12867]

The influence of the distance between narrow implants and the adjacent teeth on marginal bone levels

C. Maiorana
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how the distance between narrow implants and adjacent teeth influences the marginal bone levels (MBL) up to 3 years after placement. Material and Methods: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical study was designed to include patients missing 12, 22, 32, 31, 41 or 42 teeth. Implants of 3.0 mm diameter and different lengths were used in the study. One-stage surgery was performed and healing abutments placed during the 6-10 weeks healing period. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at implant installation, loading, and at the 6, 12, 24 and 36-months follow-up visits. Results: Eighty-three implants were placed in 59 patients. A total of 48 implants were placed in narrow implant-to-tooth spaces (percentile 25, 0.83(0.25) mm), 80 in regular spaces (percentile 25 < x < 75, 1.59(0.26) mm) and 47 in wide spaces (percentile 75, 2.61(0.51) mm). Implant MBL change from restoration delivery to 36 months was of 0.50(0.79), 0.50(0.98) and 0.00(0.55) mm in the narrow, regular and wide distance groups (P = 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test). Changes in MBL on the adjacent teeth were not significant. Conclusion: The distance between narrow-diameter implants and the adjacent teeth does not influence the marginal bone levels neither at the implant or the tooth side. In this study, less marginal bone loss occurred in the narrower spaces.
implant; incisor; marginal bone loss; narrow; small diameter; oral surgery
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GalindoMoreno_2016_ClinicalOralImplantsResearch.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 685.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
685.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/434976
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact