Aim. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of endovascular treatment and open repair of visceral artery aneurysms, and to compare their results. Methods. Between January 1995 and January 2009, 42 patients (22 males) underwent surgical or endovascular treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. Mean age was 60 13 (range, 35-85). Overall, 12 patients (25%) were asymptomatic, twenty-six patients (54.2%) were symptomatic, and 10 aneurysms (20.8%) were ruptured. The first 12 cases (28.6%) were treated with open repair; thereafter, endovascular techniques were used to treat 30 VAAs (71.4%). Results. Ten patients were treated in emergency setting [8 in the endovascular group (26.6%) and 2 in the open repair group (16.7%), P=0.491]. In the endovascular group, primary technical success was achieved in 29 of 30 VAAs (96..6%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.4%. Major complications occurred in 8 patients (3 endovascular vs 5 open repair, P=0.01). Overall, mean hospitalization was 9.7 vs. 13 days (P<0.0001). Mean follow-up was 64 months (range, 3 months-14 years). In the endovascular group, reperfusion was higher in larger (>5 cm) aneurysms (P<0.0001). Conclusion. Endovascular techniques could be the first treatment option for all visceral artery aneurysms.

Visceral artery aneurysms : management of 48 cases / G. Piffaretti, C. Lomazzi, G. Carrafiello, M. Tozzi, G. Mariscalco, P. Castelli. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0021-9509. - 52:4(2011 Aug), pp. 557-565.

Visceral artery aneurysms : management of 48 cases

G. Carrafiello;
2011

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of endovascular treatment and open repair of visceral artery aneurysms, and to compare their results. Methods. Between January 1995 and January 2009, 42 patients (22 males) underwent surgical or endovascular treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. Mean age was 60 13 (range, 35-85). Overall, 12 patients (25%) were asymptomatic, twenty-six patients (54.2%) were symptomatic, and 10 aneurysms (20.8%) were ruptured. The first 12 cases (28.6%) were treated with open repair; thereafter, endovascular techniques were used to treat 30 VAAs (71.4%). Results. Ten patients were treated in emergency setting [8 in the endovascular group (26.6%) and 2 in the open repair group (16.7%), P=0.491]. In the endovascular group, primary technical success was achieved in 29 of 30 VAAs (96..6%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.4%. Major complications occurred in 8 patients (3 endovascular vs 5 open repair, P=0.01). Overall, mean hospitalization was 9.7 vs. 13 days (P<0.0001). Mean follow-up was 64 months (range, 3 months-14 years). In the endovascular group, reperfusion was higher in larger (>5 cm) aneurysms (P<0.0001). Conclusion. Endovascular techniques could be the first treatment option for all visceral artery aneurysms.
adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; aneurysm; aneurysm, ruptured; arteries; emergencies; female; hospital mortality; humans; Italy; length of stay; male; middle aged; patient selection; retrospective studies; risk assessment; risk factors; time factors; tomography, x-ray computed; treatment outcome; viscera; endovascular procedures; vascular surgical procedures
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
ago-2011
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/432856
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact