PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and type of complications connected with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) deployment by comparing two different techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the last 3 years, 299 procedures of nephrostomy were performed on 201 patients (93 women, 108 men; mean age 65.7 years, range 32-102 years) at our Institute; all patients were affected by malignancy. In 44 cases (14.72%), patients presented grade IV hydronephrosis and in 255 cases (85.28%) grade II-III hydronephrosis. In 68 patients (23.07%), the procedure was carried out under emergency conditions because of the rapid worsening of renal function. All procedures were carried out in the angiography room, with the patient lying in a prone or prone-oblique position, under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Access to the pyelocalyceal system (intermediate or lower calices) was performed by using a Seldinger technique in 255/299 cases, or a one-step technique (OST) in 44 procedures when grade 4 hydronephrosis was present. Statistical analysis of results was performed using bilateral tests on proportions as well as chi2 test of independence for contingency tables. RESULTS: We observed no major complications. All in all, the rate of minor complications was 3.01% (9/299 cases): 8/255 (3.13%) cases with the Seldinger technique; 1/44 (2.27%) with OST. We observed 43/299 (14.4%) dislodgements: 32/255 (10.70%) with the Seldinger technique and 11/44 (3,68%) with OST. In 4/299 (1.33%), rupture of the catheter occurred, and in 2/299 (0.67%), kinking occurred (in all cases with OST). From the statistical analysis, we conclude that the examination technique modifies the percentage of complications; in particular, it significantly (p<0.05) influences complications connected with the catheter but not minor complications. In addition, the system of fixing does not affect the percentage of dislodgements. CONCLUSIONS: PCN is a method with a high percentage of technical success with low rate of complications thanks to combined use of sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance for the procedure. The OST technique is indicated for a highly remarkable hydronephrosis and in cases where the catheter is only placed for a short period. The Seldinger technique is carried out in patients with grades II and III hydronephrosis and if the disease is predicted to have a long duration.

Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy in the treatment of malignant ureteral obstructions: single-centre review = Complicanze delle nefrostomie percutanee nel trattamento dell'uropatia ostruttiva neoplastica: esperienza di un singolo centro / G. Carrafiello, D. Mangini, M. Lumia, D. Recaldini, C. Bacuzzi, A. Marconi, A. Mira, A. Cuffari, S. Fugazzola. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 1826-6983. - 111:4(2006), pp. 562-571.

Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy in the treatment of malignant ureteral obstructions: single-centre review = Complicanze delle nefrostomie percutanee nel trattamento dell'uropatia ostruttiva neoplastica: esperienza di un singolo centro

G. Carrafiello
;
2006

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and type of complications connected with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) deployment by comparing two different techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the last 3 years, 299 procedures of nephrostomy were performed on 201 patients (93 women, 108 men; mean age 65.7 years, range 32-102 years) at our Institute; all patients were affected by malignancy. In 44 cases (14.72%), patients presented grade IV hydronephrosis and in 255 cases (85.28%) grade II-III hydronephrosis. In 68 patients (23.07%), the procedure was carried out under emergency conditions because of the rapid worsening of renal function. All procedures were carried out in the angiography room, with the patient lying in a prone or prone-oblique position, under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Access to the pyelocalyceal system (intermediate or lower calices) was performed by using a Seldinger technique in 255/299 cases, or a one-step technique (OST) in 44 procedures when grade 4 hydronephrosis was present. Statistical analysis of results was performed using bilateral tests on proportions as well as chi2 test of independence for contingency tables. RESULTS: We observed no major complications. All in all, the rate of minor complications was 3.01% (9/299 cases): 8/255 (3.13%) cases with the Seldinger technique; 1/44 (2.27%) with OST. We observed 43/299 (14.4%) dislodgements: 32/255 (10.70%) with the Seldinger technique and 11/44 (3,68%) with OST. In 4/299 (1.33%), rupture of the catheter occurred, and in 2/299 (0.67%), kinking occurred (in all cases with OST). From the statistical analysis, we conclude that the examination technique modifies the percentage of complications; in particular, it significantly (p<0.05) influences complications connected with the catheter but not minor complications. In addition, the system of fixing does not affect the percentage of dislodgements. CONCLUSIONS: PCN is a method with a high percentage of technical success with low rate of complications thanks to combined use of sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance for the procedure. The OST technique is indicated for a highly remarkable hydronephrosis and in cases where the catheter is only placed for a short period. The Seldinger technique is carried out in patients with grades II and III hydronephrosis and if the disease is predicted to have a long duration.
Nephrostomy; Percutaneous drainage
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
2006
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
art%3A10.1007%2Fs11547-006-0051-2.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 283.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
283.28 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/432714
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact